Latest News

December 27, 2012

Geeking Out with...David Razowsky
by Pam Victor - 0


By WICF Contributor Pam Victor

 [“Geeking Out with…” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like Pam. The series can be found in full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog. For behind-the-scenes action, ‘like’ the “Geeking Out with…” Facebook page.]



***
As David Razowsky and I spoke via online messaging, digging deeply together into the spiritual pursuit of improvisation, I began to imagine our shared, virtual world acutely resembling the dank, mossy cave where Yoda first trained Luke Skywalker in the second/fifth Star Wars movie. I phrase this metaphor with no intended snark whatsoever, for I really did feel like I was learning under the guidance of a master. What is the Force but that to which we connect for inspiration during a truly great improv scene? Yoda says, “You must feel the Force around you; here, between you, me, the tree, the rock, everywhere, yes.” Dave says, “There are times when I improvise when I'm me, my partner, the audience, the chairs, the lighting.” And as I spoke to my Yoda, David Razowsky, I felt like Luke Skywalker trying so hard to lift his X-Wing from the muck. How to lift it without giving myself over to the Force? How to try to be the best improviser I can be? “Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try,” said Yoda. “You can only be where you are,” said Mr. Razowsky. And how lucky I was to be with Dave Razowsky for our geek out session.

David Razowsky has one of those comedy résumés that makes me swoon. Early student of Del Close at back-in-the-day ImprovOlympic. Member of the one of ImprovOlympic’s first house teams, Grime and Punishment. One of the founding members of Annoyance Theatre. Member of the Second City Mainstage cast that included Stephen Colbert, Steve Carrell, and Amy Sedaris. Artistic Director of Second City’s training center in L.A. Swoon-worthy, right? A couple decades-and-change later, he’s still going strong in Los Angeles, much to the benefit of his audiences, castmates, and students. David Razowsky currently performs at iO Theatre (L.A.), teaches master classes and workshops, and runs a weekly drop-in clinic at Theatre Asylum. He also hosts the increasingly popular A.D.D. Comedy podcast with recent guests including Stephen Colbert, Susan Messing, George Wendt, and Tim Meadows.

***
DAVID RAZOWSKY: Improv gave me the tools to see my life moment-to-moment. This is true of all aspects of what I am: traveler, reader, artist, friend, family member. All of those relationships (as well as consumer, patient, car driver, supermarket shopper) are affected by the choice to BEHERENOW.

PAM VICTOR: I'm thinking about how you got into improv. From the stories I've heard you tell, you sort of slipped into it.

DAVID:  I never think in terms of what I've slipped into. It's a flow. All the places I've gone artistically I've gone there because I walked up to them.

I was an actor in Chicago from ages 10 until I left for college (NIU '81, BA, Photojournalism.) My last year of college, I auditioned for a show, got cast in a lead role, then it was all over. I went to Chicago, did some plays, was asked to audition for Geese Theatre Company for Prisons. THERE I was introduced to improv. Non-comedic. Educational. Mask work. Movement based. Intense. Changed my life.


From there it was back to Chicago: ImprovOlympic with Del [Close], Metraform [which became Annoyance Theatre] was formed with Mick [Napier], Joe Bill, Susan Messing, Mark Sutton. Then onto Second City TourCo, and three resident companies.

David Razowsky
teacher
 PAM:  Because it appeals to my secret love of chick flicks, can you tell me about the first time you fell in love with improv? When did it “click” for you?

DAVID:  Hmmm. I remember doing an improvised movie directed by Del in a class. I remember it just working. It flowed. It was magical. He wanted us to do a Cassavetes-type film. We did one. Del said we nailed it. I thought, "Great. I just improvised a movie by an auteur I don't even know. If I can do that, what CAN'T I do with this craft?"

PAM:  That's great!

DAVID:  From that moment on, I knew I could get this. I love the fact that I can play characters I would never in a million years get cast as. Secret agents. Cops. Tall people.

I was on my way to the Santa Cruz improv festival a number of years ago. While at the airport at LAX, I visited the bookstore. I came across this great improv book that's not about improv. This changed my improv so much. [Dave sends me a link for Buddhism Plain and Simple by Steve Hagen, which I promptly bought because I always try to listen to angels.]  

PAM:  There is so much about Buddhism that is echoed in improv. Tell me about how this book changed your approach to performing.

DAVID:  It's really at the core of all I teach now days.

PAM:  Being present?

DAVID:  You can only be where you are.

There is no "later."

You're imbalanced (dukkah) when you aren't present.

Love yourself.

You're not alone.

You're not you.

You are not your story.

You are not anyone else's story either.

PAM:  We are one. Everything and nothing?

DAVID:  Yep. There are times when I improvise when I'm me, my partner, the audience, the chairs, the lighting.

PAM:  I hear you, and everything you've mentioned highlights the heart of what draws me to the stage again and again. But I'm interested in how you, personally as a performer and teacher, apply these ideas to the practical act of improvising?

DAVID:  Everything you do with me, I see. Everywhere on stage you are, I see it, and I'm inspired by it. I feel the emotional change with every shape change, with every tempo change, with every step you take in the space. You will not get away with anything when we play. I'm there to help you know that you are seen, inspiring and connected to me.

PAM:  Total commitment to listening with your heart, eyes, mind.

DAVID:  Spirit.

Being.

Joyful. Alive. Alert. Present. Constantly inspired, never panicking.

Never nervous.

Never having stage fright.

Never wondering, "How's this gonna turn out?"

I haven't had a bad show in 25 years. Others might disagree, but I'm not there to judge you, the show, or, certainly, myself.

PAM:  I am interested in this moment of change and how it relates to [Mick Napier’s edict] “holding your shit.” I know we are meant to hold our shit until we're inspired to change. But in a scene sometimes, I'm not yet always sure when that moment is the right moment.

DAVID:  "Once you define it, it exists." At the start of the scene you get to notice your emotional content. That's also your point-of-view. You stay on that track until you feel changed. You then act upon that.

The best example I can give of when to surrender (as defined by, "letting go of that which no longer serves you"): How do you know when it's time to tell someone for the first time that you love them? You just know. Ego stops you from taking the bull by the horns and charging into it. TAKE THE CHANCE!!!!!

PAM:  This topic is very relevant to me right now. I'm having trouble teaching the difference between working from inspiration rather than creation. Especially for players who are very heady rather than heart-y.

David Razwosky and Susan Messing
two heart-y improvisers
Photo credit: Sam Willard
DAVID:  You need to have exercises that let people know that the scenes are driven by the emotional connection between the scene partners. This takes time and patience because you're needing to break through ego and fear. They need to be reminded of the power of the moment. They’re controlling the scene because they want to control the outcome. They need to be reminded that in spite of what we think we NEVER know the outcome of anything.

PAM:  Personally, I improvise to get high. And the thing that gets me the highest is by creating with someone in the moment on stage. Pure discovery. That total Zen moment you were talking about, where it’s you, the people on stage, the audience, and magic. What’s the best way to get into that groove most consistently?

DAVID:  Be present as much as you can. Take in as much as you can as often as you can. Be patient and know that every time you stop seeing, you start thinking. Let yourself be surprised at being surprised. And know that every scene needs a character to have a revelation, and yours is soon to be here.

I am not eager to speak, I'm eager to respond. That way I can't wait for you to tell me what you think. I then get to respond to THAT.

It's a practice that's as fun to get as it is to miss. When you miss it you get to be present to the feeling that you missed it, then you get to laugh at your human-ness.

PAM:  Lovely. When you want to bring yourself more into the moment, is there a mantra you use? Or a way of closing the fearful, judgmental mind?

DAVID:  I am as attuned to my heartbeat and breathing as I can be. When I find that I'm out of whack, I come back to the present. I need you to tell me who I am because you need me to tell me who I am. When I'm not there to tell you who you are, you can't be there to tell me who I am.

Every moment contains the energy that brings me joy. When I find that I'm away from that, I gently and lovingly bring myself back, not dwelling on the time I was not present, but celebrating the here-ness.

PAM:  Listen. React.

DAVID:  Listen to your partner.

...then listen to your heart...

...then let your brain do what it's supposed to do…

…make sentences...

…then say those sentences....

…then be internally still and await the wonderful response that's coming your way. That's your new move.

PAM:  My job, with this series and with my life as an evolving improviser, is to explore and understand the most effective way to get high the most consistently as possible.

DAVID:  I'm high like that all of the time. I often feel like I'm not walking on earth, that I'm hovering over it, observing, feeling, laughing, being surprised, being awed, being saddened, being inspired. Always inspired.

PAM:  You must not have kids.

DAVID:  Nope. No kids.

PAM:  What I mean is, life has a way of crushing the inspiration. Snotty noses are not inspiring.

DAVID:  Okay.

PAM:  I improvise to escape the tedium of daily life. I wish I could be high like that all the time. It's a nice place to aim for.

DAVID:  I don't see it that way. Life doesn't crush inspiration. You decide that your inspiration is crushed. It's all a practice, and when you don't feel inspired you need to see the inspiration in THAT.

There is no tedium in my life, and I'm no different than you. We paste emotions onto our reality. We choose which emotions we paste. Tedium is a label. 

PAM:  I dig everything you're saying, Dave. You're TOTALLY speaking my language. Absolutely. If my friends read this piece, they're going to wonder how I stopped myself from getting on a plane, and flying over to LA to stalk you mercilessly until you agreed to be my best friend. But the conundrum for me is you're talking about getting out of your head, which is one of those commands that puts you instantly in your head. Like, "Breathe unconsciously." The instant you say it, you're consciously breathing.

DAVID: If you are trying to get out of your head, you're engaging in "trying to get out of your head." The worst note a director can give you is, “Get out of your head." It doesn't tell you where to go, or guide you. The full note needs to be, "Get out of your head and into your heart."

PAM:  To me, a lot of the magic of improv boils down to discovery vs. invention. I constantly am in a quest to open myself to moments of mutual discovery. But of course the kick in the ass with discovery is its elusiveness. The more closely you try to tail it, the farther away you get from it. How do you get yourself into moments of discovery on stage?

DAVID:  I am eager and open for anything that comes. I don't think about "discovery," rather I realize my present emotional content and play that out until a new emotional content is in front of me. I then jump on that. I don't think I have to discover. I just let the moment evolve, blossom, and bloom. Following my emotions, not the story, not the rules, not the plot. Never the plot.

I don't care about getting out the who, the what, and the where. I don't think about nor play the game of the scene. All of that is math. I don't do math. I unfold, unfurl, and evolve. I get energized. I just wanna hug and kiss and touch the person on stage with me. And not always in a creepy way. :)

PAM:  Ha! Right. Relationship and emotion live anywhere. Plot does not.

"Race"
Collage by David Razowsky
DAVID:  Your brain is a liar and an asshole.

PAM:  LOL. Say that again in another way.

DAVID:  Your ego is not allowed in the room. Your personality is not allowed in the room. Your politeness is not allowed in the room.

PAM:  Let go of everything you think you need, and then all that is left is your heart?

DAVID:  Nothing good has ever come from a union of ego and inspiration. Your feeling that you understand these things in your head...well, that's what you're engaging in instead of just being present to all that is there. You're a parent, you know about how to pick the things that need to be focused on and what can wait.

PAM:  Sure, on my good days.

So you’re saying with improv, it all comes down to the emotion of the scene. "Feel something.” Can you expound on that belief?

DAVID:  You always feel something. It's, "Be aware that you're feeling this and commit to the emotion." The only thing we ever "know," the only thing we ever "own," is what we're feeling right now. You don't know that there's money in the bank. You don't know that the school your kids go to isn't on fire. You don't know that family that is out of your sight right now are okay. But you DO know that you're now worried. Go with the worry and build on that. There's no invention needed, for all you need you have. "Replace ambition with gratefulness." True in the creation of a great scene as it is in creating a life of presentness.

PAM: I’ve been processing a lot lately about finding the comedy through the truth of a scene. I love grounded, real scene work, but of course we’re advertising ourselves as comedians. People are coming to the shows and paying to see comedy. How best are we to take advantage of the comedic moments without selling out the truth of the scene?

DAVID:  The work will always be funny if you are being honest and truthful. It will NOT be funny if you try to be funny. The humor comes from not being polite, but from being honest. People come to shows to be voyeurs. Our job is to be voyeur meat.

PAM:  Delicious.

I think I know what your answer will be, but I'll ask anyway: Where do you think the laughter in improv comes from?

DAVID:  The surprise of witnessing the character build up to and explode with honesty.

PAM [after a long pause]:  Sorry for the delay in responding to that statement. I'm just sitting here smiling.

DAVID:  I know.

PAM:  I’ve heard you say that you consider improv a sanctuary. What do you mean by that?

DAVID:  Martin de Maat said that the moment you enter the classroom or stage you surrender all rights to judge yourself or others around you. We are here to soar, to fly, not to think that we shouldn't be here, or that anyone else is better than we are, or that we don't deserve the joys of life and success and artistic fulfillment. As a teacher/director, my job is to be the midwife to your voice. When you come to me I let you know that. You must trust in yourself, and the only way to do that is to know that where you're working is a sanctuary. The next step is to realize that the world is also a sanctuary!

[At this point, I realize that our time together is almost up, and, much to my dismay, I have hardly covered any of David’s wonderful improv history. So I regretfully plan the end of our geek out with him.]

PAM:  Ok. You choose. We could do a hasty jaunt along your improv journey through iO, Annoyance and Second City - historical stuff - or continue to ponder great philosophical and spiritual questions. I have plenty of questions to do either.

DAVID:  Let's do history. I'm feeling toasty.

Grime and Punishment
Mick Napier, Madeline Long, Richard Laible,
Tim Meadows, David Razowsky
Photo from Charna Halpern's Art by Committee
PAM:  Okee...Let's stop at iO first, which I was believe your first stop into formal improv, yes? You were in the fabled iO team Grime and Punishment, which I believe was a house team after Baron’s Barracudas. Do you remember who was on that team?

DAVID:  Mick Napier, Richard Laible, Tim Meadows, Madeline Long...I hope I'm not getting this wrong. I think that was who was with us. It's really awesome how long I've been doing this. It's a good problem. An embarrassment of riches.

People gave each other shit, people supported each other, Del was clean, inspired, and at his peak. What a great time.

PAM: Mmmmm. Yum.

You've been in some pretty incredible teams. I mean, now that I think about it, you've been in some REALLY incredible teams at iO, Annoyance and Second City.

Second City years
Steve Carell, Paul Dinello,
Stephen Colbert, David Razowsky
Photo from www.nofactzone.net
DAVID:  Yes. To "grow up" with Mick and Susan and Ed Furman and Joe and Mark and Richard Laible and Ellen Stoneking (who I was with playing in prisons across the US,) and then to Second City and Carell and Colbert and Amy and Paul Dinello and John Rubano and Tom Gianis and Ken Campbell and Rose Abdoo and Jackie Hoffman (great Broadway actress).

Sorry for the awesome run on sentence that that was. The times demanded the sentences be run-ons.


PAM:  Then you were at Annoyance before it was Annoyance - when it was sitting around a table at a cafe thinking up Splatter Theater with Mick Napier. You were working with Mick, Joe Bill, Mark Sutton, Susan Messing, Tim Meadows, Faith Soloway, Jill Soloway...I mean...Hello Dolly, what a crew. This is improv porn to me.

DAVID:  Chicago theater was blooming. On fire. Anything went. People were brave and careless and courageous and smart and funny and vulnerable and supportive, and the scene was fucking beautiful.

Everyone who was creating in that time had very little need to sleep or eat healthy foods. Why sleep? You WANNA miss shit?

PAM:  Fantastic. You’ve worked at all the major improv theaters in Chicago. How did your experiences contrast at iO, Second City and Annoyance?

Dave as the Blind Hobo
DAVID:  The Venn Diagram converges at the truth that those venues insisted you live and create in.

PAM:  And now you're in LA, where palm trees loom. I have a friend who is studying improv in L.A. right now. She’s taking classes concurrently at two different theaters, and it’s really fucking with her head. If someone is moving there to study improv, how do you recommend they proceed?

DAVID:  Take classes at one place at a time. Why date as many men as you can when all you want to do is find someone to nuzzle up with, who understands you, who hears you, who speaks and understands your language? Be on ONE journey.

Oh, and take classes at Second City and iO first. You'll know who are sooner.

PAM: Let’s talk about A.D.D. Comedy, your podcast. I love it. I get to feel like I’m the coolest chick ever hanging out with these super talented people who love improv, the thing that I love most. I also find it personally inspiring. I think of A.D.D. Comedy podcast as life coaching through improv. How do you choose your guests? What sets your podcast apart?

DAVID:  If you are joyous we can talk. If you're trying to sell something, I won't help you. I really don't care about your credits. I care about your energy and passion and love for acting and creating and living and connection. There have been a couple of people who (early on) heard what the show was going to be focusing on and said "Oh, touchy feely stuff? No, thanks." I wanna say...okay. Blessings to you.

PAM:  I know our time is up, so I'll let you go. Thank you so much for your time and generosity, Mr. Razowksy. This interview is a hard candy that will melt slowly in my mouth. And I mean that in the best possible way.


***
If you haven’t read it yet,
in which Mark says,
“… all you can do is focus on the ‘now’ and play it to the fullest.”
 ***

Catch up on past improv geek-a-thons:
Geeking Out with…Chris Gethard of The Chris Gethard Show
…with Joe Bill of BASSPROV
…Jimmy Carrane of the Improv Nerd podcast
…Susan Messing of Messing with a Friend
and many more!

And "like" the "Geeking Out with..." FACEBOOK PAGE please.


Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she produces The Happier Valley Comedy Show in western Massachusetts. Pam directs, produces and performs in the comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog, "My Nephew is a Poodle." If you want to stay abreast of all the geek out action, like the “Geeking Out with…” Facebook page!




Read More

December 21, 2012

Geeking Out with...Mark Sutton (Part Two)
by Pam Victor - 0

By Contributing Writer Pam Victor

 [“Geeking Out with…” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like Pam. The series can be found in full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog. For behind-the-scenes action, ‘like’ the “Geeking Out with…” Facebook page.]

To be totally honest, I was nervous to interview Mark Sutton of BASSPROV. On stage, he seems like a sandpaper gruff guy. A straight shooter with wicked bullshit meter. And though that may be true, once we started talking I also found him to have a gooey marshmallow center. And it’s this dichotomy that makes Mark Sutton so damn delightful. He’s a dedicated family man who performed in Co-Ed Prison Sluts. A guy who’s into baseball and brioche. A Springsteen devotee who also can quote – be still my heart  - Michael Franti. As his longtime comedy partner, Joe Bill, assured me, “Mark is a teddy bear in presidential posture.” Joe should know. He’s got that same gruff-gooey groove going on.

This personality sleight-of-hand is one key ingredient in the BASSPROV magic. On the surface, the show is about Donny Weaver and Earl Hinkle, two seemingly ordinary, blue-collar, Indiana good ol’ boys fishing on a boat. But Mark and Joe play them smart and emotionally deep, and – not to give anything away but - the fishing is a red herring. BASSPROV performs the same “complex simplicity” that make TJ and Dave so impossibly compelling. As such, Mark Sutton’s work has given me a deeper understanding of what it means to “play to the top of your character’s intelligence.” In a recent set, as I watched Mark’s character opine cleverly about art history, I remember thinking, “Hey, that guy wouldn’t know all that stuff.” But ten minutes later (and again in this interview), I bitchslapped myself at my prejudice. Very consciously and thoughtfully, Mark and Joe expand their BASSPROV characters multi-dimensionally while toying with our assumptions about class and intelligence.

Mark and Joe. TJ and Dave. These performers don’t just make me want to be a better improviser, they make me want to be a smarter individual. Their work challenges us to have rich, full and varied lives off stage – as Del advised – and filter that experience and knowledge through our characters on stage. Smart comedy can be hiding anywhere, people. And if you’re lucky enough to be in the audience, you’ll find it on a small fishing boat bobbing lazily along on a remote Indiana lake.

***
PAM VICTOR: Over the weekend, I has the opportunity to be reminded of your improv history while I was in the bathroom...

MARK SUTTON: Ha.

PAM:  ...I noticed on the paper towel dispenser, it said "Georgia Pacific." [Mark was in Georgia Pacific, the talent-packed Harold troupe at iO Theatre in Chicago.]

MARK: Classic.

PAM:  Is that where the name came from?

MARK:I think so. I was not in the original group, but came in later. So they already had the name.

PAM:  How old was the group when you came in?

MARK: I think a few years. I remember in Kansas City the first time they did The Bat, and that was in the mid-late 90's. I played with them in 1999 until whenever Charna [Halpern] took them off the schedule.  Around 2001, I think.

Georgian Pacific
Chris Day, Mark Sutton,  TJ Jagodowski,
Joe Bill, Kris Hammond, Pat Shay, Bumper Carroll,
 Lisa Lewis and Jack McBrayer.
PAM:  Was that your first iO team?

MARK: Yes. I just started guesting with them.  Joe Bill had directed them. And then he started playing, so I jumped in and played.

PAM:  Actually, just a few weeks ago, Joe was regaling me with stories of your Georgia Pacific days. It seems like a drool-worthy group. You and Joe. TJ Jagodowski and Jack McBrayer [Kenneth the Page from “30 Rock.”] And then a couple other guys whose names I'm not recalling...

MARK: Pat Shay, who's awesome.  Kris Hammond - in real life a professor of artificial intelligence at Northwestern.  Chris Day and Lisa Lewis. Oh, and Bumper Carroll.

 PAM:  Oh yes. That's right. Fantastic. Though it didn’t make it in the written version, when I interviewed TJ, he told me that after Dave Pasquesi, McBrayer is the one of the partners he connects with most on stage. So I was particularly excited about imagining you two power couples – you and Joe Bill, TJ Jagodowski and Jack McBrayer - playing together on stage. Very hot.

MARK: Yeah. TJ and Jack sometimes sat in on [acclaimed Annoyance show] Screw Puppies, and I started really enjoying playing with them.  Then I had Jack in my touring company at Second City in 1999, so we bonded more then.

PAM:  I'm a huge McBrayer fan, improv-wise. I recently met him on the "30 Rock" set. He was as kind and hard-working as everyone says.


Jack McBrayer

MARK: He's just such a great performer and a genuine guy.  Georgia Pacific has not been a group for over 11 years and, to this day, every person in that group gets a call from Jack McBrayer on their birthday.

PAM:  Awww. Yeah, he seems like the real deal. That's always nice to see.

How was that experience, for you, of playing at iO after giving birth to Annoyance?

MARK: I was nervous at first.  I sort of had a reputation around IO - somewhat deserved - so that every time I would even come into the building, people would look at me and say, "What are you doing here?"...as in, “I thought you hated this place.”  Then suddenly I was playing there.  On top of that, it's a different expectation, and you're playing with people who are considered IO stars. It was strange at first.

PAM:  What was your reputation? That you hated iO?

MARK: I think it was a good one, but IO was, and still is, often very insular.  So there were tons of younger people there watching the shows who I'm sure had no idea who I was since I wasn't ever an IO guy, and they seldom ventured outside of that bubble.

And yes, I think there was a thought that I hated IO, but that goes waaay back to the "rivalry days" of Chicago improv.

PAM:  Improvisers moving to Chicago or visiting to do an intensive often ask me at which of the three big theaters they should study. What do you advise for someone just starting out studying improv in Chicago?

MARK: That's always a tough one because each place is so different and teaching comes at you in different ways.  I think the first thing you need to do - and this is often very hard - is do a really solid self-evaluation as a performer.  Not just where you think you are, but what you want.  If you are a very new improviser, you may want to go to Second City, and really get a solid foundation in the basics, then move on.  If you want to perform long form, go to IO.  If you want to work on yourself as an individual and increase your confidence, range, and character stuff...come to Annoyance.

PAM:  Ok, I have waaaay too many questions still left over, and as much as I'd LOVE to go through more history with you, I feel like I should jump into some philosophy/theory.

MARK: Cool.

PAM:  How can improvisers best get out of their own way?

MARK: Talk less...listen more.  If you are really focused on your partner and listening to them it takes you away from yourself, and you can just react.

PAM: Perhaps this next question is related. What mistakes do you see many improvisers making with regards to playing the emotional connections of a scene?

MARK: Well, first of all I think you have to go on the assumption that most improvisers are pretty shitty at emotional connection.  Why?  Because we don't want to be truly vulnerable.  Why?  Because then we can't get out of it with a joke or ironic statement for observation.  If you want to connect emotionally, you have to go all in, and that's tough for improvisers.  They find it very constricting, I think. So they sort of go there...but then you don't buy it.

PAM:  You don't buy it because it doesn't come from a grounded place?

MARK: Right. And you - the audience - can tell they are not really engaged, so you are waiting for the joke. Then neither the joke nor the connection has the right payoff.

PAM:  You're saying the comedy - or joke - of the scene is the Achilles heel of most improvisers?

MARK:  I would say it's even simpler than that.  I think it's expectation. (I'm really big on this right now.) Too many improvisers go into scenes with too much expectation.  It's the whole "get out of your head" thing.  I think improvisers get in their heads because they project results on to their choices...now you have expectation about something that is not totally in your control. And when those expectations are not met in the scene, it throws you off.

 PAM:  Agh. This is too delicious. I'm on overload of threads I want to follow here. Let's start with your feelings on expectations, which is something that I wanted to ask you anyway. I heard that you said in a workshop that you don’t like when people say, “Let’s have a great show” or “Let’s make this the best show ever.” Can you explain what it is you don’t like about that mindset, and how you think improvisers should best approach a show? Is this the expectation thing you were referring to?
Mark in BASSPROV

MARK: Yes, it speaks directly to the expectation thing.  Everybody wants the show to be great...that's a given.  But how to you "try" to do a great show?  That's a ridiculous position to put yourself in before walking onstage.  All you can do is what you are going to do, and then it will be great - or not - depending on what happens.  

It's also a totally personal evaluation.  So, for instance, if you are in a six person group, you have six different ideas of what "great' is. So now you are all - without really knowing it - pulling in six different directions.  But...if you simply agree to commit and serve the show no matter what happens and what presents itself, then you're all pulling in the same direction.

PAM:  Please tell me more about how an improviser should set her mind before a show. I mean, literally, what words can we tell our team as a mantra before we go on stage?

MARK: I've been performing since 1984, and as best as I recall, I've never said, "Let's go do a great show."  I look at people backstage and simply say, “Let's do a show.”  Or, “Let's have fun”.....or sometimes, in the Annoyance mindset,  “Don't fuck it up.”  That's a way of saying, " Whatever is about to happen is supposed to happen."  That's just how it is, and you give yourself over to that and ride the wave.

PAM:  It's about being PRESENT on a molecular and psychic level.

MARK: I think so...what else can you do?  

Many people know that three of my biggest passions outside of improv are baseball, cooking and survival.  I love survival shows and the outdoors.  In all of those things, you have to be present, focused.  You have to be in contact with the food, the earth, all that shit.  It makes you present. You can't take things for granted.  If you are serving dinner for 38 people like I did the other night, you can't take for granted the food tastes good. You have to taste it, be with it, respond to it all the time.

PAM: I see what you mean. There are many ways to approach getting into the Moment. It's all so fucking Zen when it comes do to it. Do you see that, or is it too woo-woo for you? (I'm a hippy.)

MARK: No, I think it's totally like that.  You have to quiet your mind and be present...then deal with what's actually happening and not what you want to have happen. Like survival.  You must assess, adapt, and react to the situation as it is.  And you can't have expectations...you just see and respond.  Play the scene that's happening, not the one you want to have happen.

PAM:  Now I understand better what you mean about "getting out of your own way." I am left wondering how to encourage improvisers to achieve this level of commitment and mindfulness. I'm speaking in purely practical matters here.

MARK: I think you encourage improvisers to trust each other and be okay with it not always being okay. It's fine to be searching a bit during a show, that's discovery.  It's fine if the audience doesn't always get it, that's surprise.  All those things are fine and what makes improv great.

PAM:  I'd like to come back to the idea of vulnerability. Actually I have a really hard time with that term because I find it very nebulous. It's hard to teach "vulnerable," which is why I think there must be another term or approach. But still I'm wondering how best can an improviser get to a real place of vulnerability?

MARK: Yeah, it's a tough word because it sounds like you're asking performers to be pussies.

PAM:  Hahaha!

MARK: But I think it's different.  I think it's about not worrying how you look.  Losing the cool, detached element that so many performers, especially guys, feel like they need to have to be "comedians."  Why do TJ and Dave relate to so well?  Because they are not afraid to take the shell off and be hurt – affected - by the other.  Why is Louis CK so great in his show?  Because he's vulnerable...he's real and the funny comes from that genuine quality.

PAM:  But here's the problem, Mark. How do you TEACH vulnerable?

MARK: Here's how I do it.  I put performers in places they don't want to go, and I make them react truthfully.  I constantly call them out on what is happening and how they are reacting to it, pushing for consistent emotional response and not selling out moments. “Why did you say that?  Your scene partner just said this to you....how are you going to respond to that, etc.”  You keep making people go to that place until the muscle gets built.

PAM:  Yes, yes. I love it so much. And this leads to our next issue: Fear. I have been thinking a lot lately about the place of fear in improvisation. I’ve been struck by the interesting fact that fear is the crux of the problem nearly every time – if not literally every time – an improviser is lead astray in a scene. It’s fascinating to watch new improvisers in particular twist themselves into knots in order to avoid making an actual declaration or action. And I feel like fear is behind all of those machinations.  On a psychological level, why do you think fear has such a monumental, dark force in improvisation?

MARK: Because more people want to be right than happy.  “I can't just make a choice...I must make the right choice, for the scene, for the improv rule, for the form...blah blah.” Now you're improvising out of obligation and not inspiration, and that's probably going to suck.  Why? Because you are not coming from a place of joy.  "I want to do this...but what if it messes things up?"  How can it mess it up if whatever happens is supposed to happen?

PAM:  It can mess up if it sucks! If the audience isn't entertained. And that is terrifying.

MARK: But that's going on the assumption that every scene will be great...and that's a false assumption.

PAM:  Ah. You must continue that train of thought, if you please.

MARK: At Annoyance, we used to use the term, " You have to stop caring."

PAM:  You're saying we have to avoid letting sucky improv scenes throw us off our game? Just let go.

MARK: Absolutely.  I used to tell my students that the one thing a great scene and a shitty scene have in common is that when they are over, they are over and you can't get them back.  So stop worrying. Have the most fun you can in the moment and move on. Some scenes are going to be bullshit...you can't measure yourself against anything but the next scene.  

Here is where baseball comes in.  You strike out...big deal.  The next time you come up it's totally different.  You can be burdened by the worry of the last strikeout, or you can treat this at bat for what it is, totally fresh, and see what happens.  We worry too much.

PAM:  Jeepers, Mr. Sutton. "Stop caring" is such a huge, fucking, hard thing for improvisers because deep down most of us need the audience's laughter/approval in order to fuel the beating of our hearts.

MARK: Here's the irony: If you care too much about form, your choices, the audience, some bullshit rule…it takes you out of your pure creative space.  So now, the thing that makes you unique and desirable as a performer - you're creative fire and inspiration - is being compromised. So in your fervent desire to care, you've taken away from yourself the only thing that the audience truly cares about, your playfulness.

PAM:  It seems like fear and joy almost need to work together. I imagine there isn’t much fear for you when you’re performing these days. But we know how important "following the fear" - or being most emotionally real and vulnerable - is in improv. All these years in, how do you personally put yourself in a state of joyful fear before and during a show?

MARK: Well, I think the fear is always there to some degree.  But in time you come to embrace it.  It just means that you care, and that's good.  But you don't care to the point that you let the fear get in your way.  How do I do that?  By reminding myself to be proactive.  I remind myself that whatever happens will happen because of choices that I make from inspiration and not choices that I don't make because of fear of failure.

Now even if the scene or the show is not that great, it is so proactively, and I can walk away feeling okay.  I never walk away saying, "If I'd only done this or that, it may have been different."  I was proactive, and I made choices. I'm good with that.

PAM:  Moving on to another Del Close concept, I'm wondering what this quote means to you: "If we treat each other as if we are geniuses, poets, and artists, we have a better chance of becoming that on-stage."

MARK: I suppose it's about respect.  Respect each other for your abilities and points of view.  Respect the process.  Respect the audience.  One of my big things about improvisers is how lazy they often are.  Either overtly or covertly.  This goes to things like showing up on time, how you get ready for a show, how you dress, etc.  That's all about different levels of respect.

PAM:  I know you’ve told it too many times to count, but just for posterity sake, can you please tell me the story of how BASSPROV came to be?

MARK: It was during Screw Puppies.  The format was improv that looked like sketch, meaning that all scenes were blacked out from the booth.  Joe and I came out one night and found ourselves in two chairs and just started fishing.  We liked the characters and occasionally brought them back, always saying they should have their own show.  Then in 2001, leading up to Chicago Improv Festival, I called [Chicago Improv Festival Production’s Executive Director] Jonathan Pitts and told him we were workshopping a show and wanted a slot to try it out.  He gave us a 4am slot in Improv All Night.  I immediately called Joe and told him we had a slot and now must come up with a show. So we sort of forced our own hand to create it.  We did it at 4am to a sold out house and went from there.

PAM:  In an interview with the Austin Improv Forum, you said about your BASSPROV characters, “The key to these guys and to the show is that just when you think you've got them figured out...they surprise you.”

MARK: Yeah, I enjoyed playing with audience expectation about these guys.  Because we, as a society see so much in black and white and people just aren't like that.  I think Donny and Earl prove that out.

PAM:  Personally, I think that magic and surprise element comes from your high level of reference, and how you and Joe funnel your own intelligence through these seemingly blue-collar characters.

MARK: Certainly...because blue collar doesn't mean stupid.

PAM:  Touché.

It's remarkable that you and Joe have maintained such a strong connection on stage for going on three decades now.

MARK: It's sort of crazy.  We don't see each other as much as in the days of Annoyance, but the connection is still there.

It's the same with Mick and me.

PAM:  Do you ever get surprised by something Joe says on stage? Or do you feel like a well-oiled machine at this point?
Mark and Joe
Donny and Earl
BASSPROV

MARK: Oh yeah.  There is the famous Mad Cow story from the Miami Festival some years ago.  Joe decided that, instead of talking about Mad Cow, he was going to have it. He just kept getting more and more manic, and couldn't stay on topic, etc.  For about two-thirds of the show I did not know what the hell was going on.  And people in the audience who knew us told me after that they could see Mark getting pissed and not Donny. I was ready to kill him.  Then I finally got it and the audience went nuts.

Then there was Seattle in ‘08 when the normally conservative Donny revealed his Obama t-Shirt.  Joe freaked on that one.

PAM:  Because I most enjoy it when done slowly, mindfully and fully present, can you tell me about the pace of BASSPROV and why it helps to make such delectable improv?

MARK: The best note we were ever given about the show was by a brilliant guy named Don Hall.  We did the show in his WNEP Theater in the beginning, and one night he came backstage and - in his own Don Hall way – said, "Can I make a suggestion? Shut the fuck up and fish."  We were talking too much.  We weren't relaxed.  We had to relax, fish, drink beer, take better care of the mood, and then the words take care of themselves.

PAM:  Fantastic. Do you still get off on performing BASSPROV? What about the show continues to draw you back in?

MARK: I just love it.  I love the characters, the interplay.  I love showing these guys to the audience, surprising them.  And, there's always new stuff to talk about.

PAM:  Awww. I love that you still love it. Sorry to go all girly on you just then, but it slipped out.

MARK: Ha!

PAM:  One more BASSPROV question. I'm reticent to ask it because I may be about to sound prudish or a buzz-kill here just by asking the question, but can you explain the significance or reasoning for drinking beer during your set?

MARK: You drink beer when you fish.  That's really it.

PAM:  Have you ever done the show without beer?

MARK: Yes. We did a morning show for students at CIF one year, and we drank coffee.

PAM:  Hahaha. How did that go?

MARK: It was fine.  We don't "need" the beer...it just makes it more fun. (That's sounds like the alcoholic handbook right?)

PAM:  I should move on... You are one of the relatively few improvisers I know who is able to make a living off improv. Is your main, money-making gig Second City BizCo?

MARK: Yeah, doing corporate workshops, event hosting, large shows.  Then also teaching at Annoyance and some freelance stuff.

PAM:  Cool. My improv friends and I constantly struggle with how improviser can make a living through improv. Suggestions?

MARK: I think it's really perseverance and marketing.  You have to come up with a program and sell the program.  Be specific because business doesn't buy vague.

PAM:  What kind of "program" can an improviser come up with to sell?

MARK: You have to come up with a program that speaks to business.  For instance at Second City we teach Communication Skills, Presentation Skills...etc., and sell that to the business angle. But it's all based on improv.

PAM:  Ok, Mr. Sutton. We've come to the end of our show here.

MARK: Aaawww.

PAM:  Thank you so very, very much for geeking out with me. You definitely were the most slippery of fish that took months to finally land, but entirely worth the wait.

MARK: Finally...right?  And I want to leave you with one more thing.  This was really the inspiration for all my current teaching about commitment and emotional connection. And...it's from a Starbuck's coffee cup:  "The irony of commitment is that it's deeply liberating - in work, in play in love.  The act frees you from the tyranny of your internal critic, from the fear that likes to dress itself up and parade around as rational hesitation. To commit is to remove your head as the barrier to your life." - Anne Morris

PAM:  That's great…and so true. I find tea bags to be very inspirational.
Photo credit:
Quotes Temple
***
If you haven’t read it yet,
in which Mark says,
“… all you can do is focus on the ‘now’ and play it to the fullest.”
 ***

Catch up on past improv geek-a-thons:
Geeking Out with…Chris Gethard of The Chris Gethard Show
…with Joe Bill of BASSPROV
…Jimmy Carrane of the Improv Nerd podcast
…Susan Messing of Messing with a Friend
and many more!

And "like" the "Geeking Out with..." FACEBOOK PAGE please.


Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she produces The Happier Valley Comedy Show in western Massachusetts. Pam directs, produces and performs in the comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog, "My Nephew is a Poodle." If you want to stay abreast of all the geek out action, like the “Geeking Out with…” Facebook page!




Read More