Latest News

February 29, 2012

Geeking Out with...Will Luera
by Pam Victor - 1

by WICF Contributor Pam Victor

[“Geeking Out with…” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like me. The series can be found in full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog.]



To know Will Luera is to love him. I’ve had several, “OMG, how much do we love Will???” conversations recently. And a not-surprisingly equivalent number of people credit Will with opening them up to the true joys of Really Good Improv. As comedian Zabeth Russell, who does the two-person show Ay Diego with Will, told me in a soon-to-be-posted Geeking Out with… interview, “I don't think there's anyone from my time at IB who hasn't been positively influenced by him.” And Women in Comedy Festival co-producer Elyse Schuerman confessed to me, “Will is definitely a huge influence on my style…that being my sexy Mexican American look.” See what I mean, you guys? If you’ve read other interviews in this series, you’ll know I’m not very good at hiding my fandom, nor do I want to be. I’m a dork. Whatever. If you don’t like that I’m a huge Will Luera fan, you can bite me right on my lady ass. As I’ve blubbered embarrassingly to him on more than one (believe it or not, sober) occasion, he’s been a ginormous influence on my development as an improviser. But enough about me, let’s talk about Will.

Will Luera has been Artistic Director of ImprovBoston and director of and, until recently, performer in their acclaimed Mainstage show since 2000. Among many other shows, Will directed Sitcom, Blue Screen and Quest. In addition to his work at ImprovBoston, Will founded his own improv theater, Blue Screen, and has worked with Improv Asylum, Theatre Tribe, and Another Country Productions. But let’s have Will tell you all about it himself…

PAM VICTOR: I'm always curious about how people found improv or how improv found them. I know you grew up in Chicago. Were you exposed to improv as a kid?

 WILL LUERA:  Nope. I grew up on the South-side, the non-improv side of Chicago. The north side of a Chicago, where all of the improv theaters are, was a foreign concept to me growing up until I went to high school. It wasn't until around my senior year in high school that I even knew what improv was. Ironically, I wasn't truly exposed to improv until I moved away from Chicago. I really learned about it at Boston College.

 PAM:  That's funny (and sort of sad.) So when did you first do improv? In college?

 WILL:  Yep, spring of 1993.  The Committee for Creative Enactments.

 PAM:  What was that? A program? Or a funny troupe name?

WILL:  It was a bad name for a really cool group. Basically, we performed murder mysteries. The group would write two original murder mysteries per year. The shows would be about 2-3 hours long and the audience would be immersed in a show where about 40% of it was scripted and the rest was improvised. We would take over a house for 2-3 hours, and we would perform scenes that were part of the murder mystery. When we weren't in a scene, we would just be characters interacting with the audience.

Although I didn't realize it at the time, some valuable lessons were being taught to me that would become important to me later as an improviser and then as an AD:
1.) Before it was hammered home by Mick Napier, I learned to never drop my character's intention or goal;
2.) Narrative improvisation is possible - This became a valuable lesson that later lead to the ton of showcase shows we do at IB;
3.) Experiential theater - To this day, I'm a big fan of theater that involves all senses of the audience and allows them to immerse themselves in a totally different world for a couple of hours.

PAM:  Wow. That is a truly unique introduction to improv. You win for most original response to that question! So when did you start getting trained in improv comedy? Or did you just start performing straight away?

Will Luera

WILL:  I guess I was trained as part of the first show I did the spring of 1993. It was an improvised western show called The Good, the Dead and the Ugly. I'll never forget my audition - since I had started school at Boston College during the fall of 1992, I was looking for a way to do theater, which I got hooked on in high school (because of a girl...a whole other story). So, I had no idea how to "break in to" the theater scene at BC. But one night while I was walking to my dorm, I saw a flyer for an audition and it said the most important words for me at that time: "No preparation or monologue necessary." The flyer was for auditions happening that night at another dorm building. I walked there, auditioned for the part of "Tabasco Cabaillaro," and the rest is history.

PAM:  LOL!  I'm starting to get the feeling that most men go into theater and/or improv just to get laid. (But that's a whole other article.) [For Will’s full story of how love was the gateway drug to improvisation, see Pam’s blog, My Nephew is a Poodle.]

WILL:  As far as formal training is concerned, that happened after college. I found a class being taught by ImprovBoston alum named Marjorie Burren.

PAM: And what was that first class like for you? Was it an instant attraction to improv?

 WILL:  Oh yeah. That first class was awesome...suddenly all of these improv games and warm-ups I had been doing in college made sense. I started to get the idea that these improv games weren't about competition or one-upping each other, but about actually building something together. This was a big moment.

PAM: How did you get from the first class to being Artistic Director of ImprovBoston?

WILL:  Reflecting back to your first question, in a weird way and for my own improv path, I think I benefited from not being exposed to improv in Chicago. It allowed me to develop my own ideas of what improv was and could be. These ideas developed into a style of improv that I called "Blue Screen."

All of this was happening while I was in college doing improvised murder mysteries. I was already starting to formulate ideas for doing full-length improv shows that could be anything...thus the name Blue Screen, although I think green screen is more apropos these days. Anyway, this idea in my head of what improv could be was just reinforced and strengthened as I took classes.

Then in October 1997, I was cast at ImprovBoston with Don Schuerman (whom I went to BC with) and Amy Rhodes (who is doing well out in LA.) As a performer at IB, every show and rehearsal just continued to feed into my concept of Blue Screen. In the fall of 1998, I produced a show called Sitcom at IB which first introduced me to the Harold (which fed into my Blue Screen idea.) And then in the spring of 1999, I left ImprovBoston to rent a space in Davis Square which I called "Blue Screen Productions." This created quite a buzz around the very small Boston improv scene and a year and a half later, on September 1, 2000, I was hired back at ImprovBoston as the Artistic Director.

 PAM:  Explain Blue Screen, the style of improv, to me some more please.

WILL:  So basically, I was seeing this show where any type of scene can happen anywhere on the stage. All genres, all forms of stagecraft - the entire space was available to you. As I formed it in my head, I had no idea what sweeps or tagouts were, so scenes would just morph from one to the next using the previous scene or your scene partner as inspiration. What I was crafting in my head I would later recognize as "free-form." Later, all of my classes and lessons would provide me with the tools to teach this style. Ultimately, this idea is what became the IB Mainstage show. The fact that we were nominated for an INNY [Improvisation News awards] became a huge validation for me and for that young kid who was thinking up these ideas 15 years ago.

 PAM:  That's amazing, Will….You invented improv!

 WILL:  Haha!

 PAM:  And it totally explains why you're such a talented teacher and player.

 WILL:  Awww...shucks. Thanks. That path is what has led me to make ImprovBoston not a theater that focuses on one school of improv, but one that embraces all of them. I think its important that we, as a comedy school and theater, embrace and appreciate the teachings of Viola, Del, de Maat, Napier, UCB, etc.

If we understand all of them, then we can try to reach for something that unifies all of them. Of course, that's also my math/physics brain talking.

 PAM:  True to form, you're leading seamlessly into my next question: As the Artistic Director at IB, what do you think defines ImprovBoston stylistically and philosophically? (We will come back to your math/physics brain, I promise! That is another one of my questions.)

WILL:  I'll begin by describing what I consider to be the main goal of our 601 class, the final class of our improv core: Finding a form where there is no form. In my opinion, again math/physics brain talking, the first move in a show can define the DNA and characteristics of the rest of the show if you're truly in tune to what that first move is doing. That first move will tell you what the show wants to say, what it wants to be, what the style of it will be, what it will look like, its pace, its length, etc. I can also apply the same philosophy to the start of a scene, but for this discussion, I'll look at it on a show level.

That first move exists without judgment or context...as a group, we observe it and act on it and then the laws and DNA of the show start to reveal themselves, and then the form where there is no form starts to appear. That for me is free-form at its purest level. In order to get there, we teach our students to embrace short-form, the Harold, Viola [Spolin]'s theater games, etc. Before you can understand Relativity, you need to understand Newtonian laws, modern physics, mechanics, etc.

PAM:  Hahahahaha! Can you hear the sound of my brain exploding from there?

WILL:  Oh no! Your brain!

 PAM:  It's okay. I hardly use it all. I'm all limbic system these days.

 WILL:  Okay, I feel less guilty.

 PAM:  I have a theory that pretty much every strong male improviser has some other major geek action going on, which is somehow related to why they are good improvisers. I still haven't figured out what the correlation is, but I'm working on it.

WILL:  I definitely think you're on to something there.

 PAM:  I know, right?

WILL:  I'm curious to know what your findings will be.

 PAM:  But it's not the case with female improvisers, who usually are super smart but typically not in the same intensely mathematical or scientific or superhero comic ways.

 WILL:  I created my show Quest because when I started to sit in on D&D games, I realized that the veil between both was insanely thin.

 PAM:  Yeah, I suppose that improv is just a staged role-playing game…Or D&D is just improv in a dark room with greasy food and boys who haven't gotten laid yet.

 WILL:  Ha!

 PAM:  Ok, backing away from brain-exploding theories and into the world of the practical. What are you listening for when you're performing? I'm always interested in getting down to the bare bones essentials for good improv. The seed of a great scene, I guess.

WILL:  Well, I'm sorry to say that my answer will tie back into theories, although not as brain-exploding because I think it’s theory that we all accept: The building block of any scene for me is emotion and how emotions relate to each other. Emotion + emotion = relationship. So, I'm listening for an emotion. How do you feel about me or about what you're doing right now? Once I know that, I can calibrate myself around that choice. And if I'm working with a novice, I try to introduce a strong emotional choice into the scene for them that forces them to respond.

PAM:  Dude, we are SO in tune with each other right I now I wish we were in stage. That is totally my next question.

WILL: :-)

 PAM:  So...here's that thread of questions I wrote on that point:

Pardon me if I have told you this before, but you, kind sir, have been extremely instrumental in my development as an improviser. Even though I don’t get to work with you nearly often enough, the skills you have taught me have lasted years. So, first of all, thank you, Will.

(I'm not just flattering you or brown-nosing or whatever. I actually have a strong belief system that relates to the importance of expressing gratitude when given the opportunity.)

I know that different teachers have different philosophies about what improvisers should use at their go-to, whether it’s finding the game or establishing a firm character or whatever. But, in my observation, you boil it down to relationship and emotion, and that really resonates with me in my scene work. Can you talk about relationship and emotion?

 WILL:  Thank you, Pam!

 PAM:  Thank you, Will.

Ok, enough of this sappy shit. Answer my question, bitch.

 WILL:  Yessssss. Finally!

 I really do feel that if you peel away all of the fancy forms and improv buzz words, an audience is there to see a relationship play itself out. An improv audience (for the most part) wants to see a relationship that reveals interesting characteristics about some characters, explores that revelation, and resolves it in a humorous way.

There are many variables that will make a scene fun and funny: the physicality of our character, the voice, the mannerisms, the space-time of the scene, our own experiences, etc. But before any of that, I like to have actors who are comfortable making and committing to interesting emotional choices.

There are your default-but-interesting emotional choices - love/hate, love/love, hate/fear, happy/happy, happy/sad - but then there are more interesting emotional contrasts, and I think that's where the real tension (and comedy) lives.

And I try to remind my students: Relationship is what happens between any two emotional states co-existing in the same space. The mere fact that these two emotions are co-existing on a stage right now IS the relationship. Now it’s our job to explore that, not justify it.

This whole idea came to me when I started to think of characters on stage as objects in space with a gravitational pull. In physics, we say that every particle in the universe has some sort of gravitation tug on every other particle in the universe. I apply that same theory to the stage, but the particles are people. Physics helped me conceptualize it, and I'll always remember when Joe Bill reinforced it with a similar concept in one of his workshops.

PAM:  What was that concept? (My guess is that it either has to do with neuropsychology...or masturbation.)

WILL:  I remember he did an exercise where two people were on the stage and he said, "Lights up. Lights down," so the scene was about 1/2 second long. I remember him saying that the fact that they were onstage together automatically gave them a relationship.

I was like, "Yes!" In the "universe" that is the "stage" the mere fact that they’re onstage at the same time already gives them a relationship.

…And then we all masturbated.

 PAM:  Hahahahahaha! (That was a literal laugh out loud.)

 WILL:  I think for me, it’s that I think of improv as theater. As soon as the "curtain is up," you're on. You shouldn't be trying to find anything; your scene is in motion.
That's why over time, I try to remove and improve stagecraft shorthand moves that reveal the strings behind improv. The fewer taps, sweeps, etc. you can do, the more it looks like theater. However, if it’s just a good, old jam with a bunch of improvisers, I don't see anything wrong with using the shorthand moves

 PAM:  I was just watching some video of you and Zabeth Russell in Ay Diego from the Women in Comedy Festival 2010. Your transitions were very cool.

WILL:  Yeah, I remember when we first thought of it. I liked it because it speaks to my physics mind. I like exploring how one line can exist and be said in an infinite number of ways and mean something different each time, even though it’s the same words.

 PAM:  OMG, you are so f'n geeky. I love it.

 WILL:  ;-)

 PAM:  What is your idea of a PERFECT improv experience?

 WILL:  Hmmm...I'm thinking back of my most memorable experiences over the years, but I have to say that the show the IB Mainstage did at last year’s Del Close Marathon was the closest to perfection that I had ever been apart of. It was a free-form set where scenes were folding on top of one another and morphing in and out of different relationships and scenarios without a tapout, tag, sweep, etc...and then, in the final minute, we completely unwrapped all of those scenes and tied up multiple scenes in a matter of seconds. And the great thing about that show, and why I love free-form, is because no one was ever thinking about what had to happen next. We just explored and kept discovering new awesome scenes together.

Also, a second answer to your question: I love when improv is treated as theater by both the actors and audience. I'll never forget when I directed in an improvised play series at IB, and at the end of the show we had the audience crying because two characters kissed goodbye after realizing that they would not be able to spend their lives together because they were stuck in their current relationships.

PAM:  Awesome. I have to just add, for the record, that IB Mainstage is always off the hook at DCM, but I think the last couple years have taken it to a whole new level. You guys are becoming one of the must-see shows.

 WILL:  Thank you! Yeah, we love performing at DCM. I think it has to do with the audience. They are so open to what we're doing.

PAM: Who are your improv role models, the people whose methods continue to inspire you?

 WILL:  My head was cracked in three phases - Todd Stashwick and Burn Manhattan, Joe Bill, and Mick Napier. I find it amazing that I can call Joe and Mick friends. It's still amazing to me.

Will and Don Schuerman
As performers, Don Schuerman and Zabeth Russell are the two most brilliant improvisers I've ever performed with, so giving, and they can turn anything into gold.



 PAM: You have gotten to work with the big Mexican improv troupe, ImproTOP. Tell me about that experience.

WILL:  I met them in 2006 at a festival in Puerto Rico. They are an amazing talented group, and I'm proud to have them as friends. After I saw them perform I had to get them to Boston and also introduce them to Jonathan Pitts of CIF [Chicago Improv Festival]. I'm glad that they've done so well over there.

One of the important facts for me about their style is that they were created outside of the American improv system. Many gringos think that improv has to come from Second City, iO, UCB, etc., but they came from outside of that and are kicking ass.

That's why I feel it’s important to always be in a position to absorb new ideas and philosophies instead of cornering yourself into one mindset. IB is like the UU of Comedy Schools. ;-)

 PAM:  Now you're speakin' my hippie language. Ok. You can answer this one in one word if you want. Improv: Art or craft?

 WILL:  Art.

 PAM:  This is my absolute last question. It comes from The Dorky Pharmacist of FacebookLand.

Will Luera: Innie or outie?

 WILL:  Way innie...explanation:

Until 10 years ago I had a belly button, a cute one in fact. Then, it started to balloon - like, literally, it looked and felt like a small balloon - you push it and squeeze it and it would fill back. I was in Mexico showing it to family and my uncle was like, “I think that's a hernia.”

Sure enough, I come back home, go to the doctor, and she tells me that I have an umbilical hernia. Basically, it’s there because my belly button wasn't tied up properly as a kid. So, I have to go under the knife, so that they could fix it...and now my belly button is gone.

It's just a crevice.

It’s sad.

 PAM:  Oh no! You had a bellybutton-ectomy?

 WILL:  Yup.

 PAM:  I'm sorry I'm laughing.

 WILL:  It’s okay. It is funny

 PAM:  You're the virgin birth!

You heard it here first, ladies and gentlemen. Not only did Will invent improv, but he's the son of God.

 WILL:  I'm putting both of those things on my business card.

 PAM:  I think you should also put "It's just a crevice" on your card too. Or it could be the name of your memoir.

 WILL:  Memoir, definitely.


Will's future memoir?
Artwork by Heather Dawson









Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she producesThe Happier Valley Comedy Shows in Northampton, MA. Pam directs, produces and performs in the hot, new comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog,"My Nephew is a Poodle."
Read More

February 28, 2012

Bullish: How Business Is Like Dating
by Liz McKeon - 1

By Contributor Jen Dziura 

This article originally appeared on TheGloss.

Business is a lot like dating. Like cold-hearted, competitive dating among people who don’t love each other. In other words, like awful, awful dating.

Once upon a time, when I was considering moving to New York, I looked for jobs. A Director of Marketing position was available at a company I’ll call QuixoticIdea.Com. I was an unconventional candidate — I’d never held a “real job,” but had run a company for about five years despite my relative youth — so I wrote what I remember to be a pretty persuasive email regarding some marketing ideas I had for QuixoticIdea.

The CEO of the company got back to me right away. He wanted to do a phone interview. Cool. During the phone interview, he asked me a lot of really detailed questions about my ideas. He said he’d get back to me about maybe doing an in-person interview.

Read the rest at TheGloss.


Jennifer Dziura (jenniferdziura.com) writes career and life coaching advice for young women at TheGrindstone and TheGloss. She believes you can make money without being a douchebag. She believes in working harder and smarter now so you can have "balance" when you're wrinkly and covered in diamonds. She believes in starting businesses on zero dollars, selling expensive things to rich people, and laughing very hard at people who try to "manifest their dreams" without learning any real skills or shaping the fuck up. She likes to help. Jennifer also performs (sort of) educational one-woman shows about philosophy and punctuation. Her "The History of Women in 30 Minutes" is appearing in the Women in Comedy Festival.
Read More

Catching Up With Kat Radley, WICF 2011 Friars Club Award Winner
by Liz McKeon - 1

By WICF Editor Liz McKeon

Were you one of the audience members who voted for Kat Radley at last year's Women in Comedy Festival? Whether you saw her and loved her, or sadly managed to miss her, she's one to watch. We caught up with Kat to see how the past year has treated her.

WICF: How did you get started in comedy?

Kat: When I was in college at the University of Virginia, Rooftop Comedy started their National College Comedy Competition. I had been secretly writing jokes and thinking of trying stand up, (I had also been secretly stealing food from the dining hall in tupperware), so when I heard they were coming to UVA for the contest, I decided to enter it. I ended up doing pretty well. I made it to the final four and won a trip to their 2008 festival in Aspen. And yes, the beer there does in fact flow like wine.

WICF: What advice do you have for working comics and for comics who are just starting out?

Kat: Define "working comics." I think it really comes down to hustle. When I moved to Los Angeles and decided to really "go for it" in comedy, I told myself that I would say yes to every opportunity that came my way. Whether it be submitting for a festival, doing a show in a bowling alley, or going on a “date” with a 51-year old "agent," you never know what might come out of it (herpes).

Also, be nice and friendly to everyone you meet, even if they are weird and annoying. Not because it's the right thing to do, but because someday they might be super successful and you can ride their coattails. At least, that's what my mother taught me.

WICF: What was your experience at WICF 2011 like?

Kat: WICF 2011 was awesome. I love the Boston scene. All the comics there are so friendly and supportive, at least they are to out-of-towners. It was also great to take advantage of some of the workshops and panels that happened throughout the weekend. I always learn so much from my fellow comics.

I think it's especially great that there is a festival specifically designed to showcase and promote female comedians. Comedy is definitely still a man's world, and I use the word “man” in the loosest terms.

WICF: How’s the Friars Club show working out?
Kat: The Friars Club has been great in working with me to figure out a date. It’s tough because I live across the country, so it’s been hard coordinating a good time I can make it out there.

I think it will probably happen this coming spring. I can’t wait! I think the award has helped me. I've included it on applications for other festivals and showcases, and I have been accepted… we’ll say it’s all because of the award. It hasn’t been as helpful picking up guys. Whenever I bring it out to bars, men throw around ridiculous words like, “pretentious,” and, “crazy,” and “You can’t drink that in here. This is a grocery store.” I don’t get it.

WICF: How was the Magners Stand-Off?

Kat: The Magners Festival was so much fun! The shows were great and I made it to the finals. There were a lot of really strong comics competing, and I’m sure the judges agonized over who should win, but they ultimately did not pick me. Matt D. won, and he totally deserved it. He killed.

I still consider myself a winner because I got to drink free Magners all weekend, and I won $50 on a Patriots scratch ticket. Call me crazy if that doesn’t beat a trip to Scotland.

WICF: What are you up to now?

Kat: Currently I am living in Los Angeles, teaching high school kids by day and doing comedy by night. Yes, you’re right. I am just like a superhero.

I’m actively working on my stand-up, but I am also a part of an improv team and a sketch group. I have no problem staying busy.


Keep up with Kat via her website www.katradley.com, on Twitter, and on Facebook. You can see her perform in the WICF 2012 show "Beards and Broads, Hosted by Matt Kona" on Friday, March 23 at 9 PM at Grandma's Basement.


Kat made her stand-up debut by competing in Rooftop Comedy’s National College Comedy Competition, where the public voted her into the Final Four, landing her a spot in the 2008 Aspen Rooftop Comedy Festival. Since then she has performed in the 2010 World Series of Comedy in Las Vegas, on Tom Arnold’s Laughing with the Stars at the Laugh Factory, and at clubs and colleges across the country. She won second place in the “Funniest Comic in SoCal Contest” at the Jon Lovitz Club and she performs improvisational comedy at the Upright Citizens Brigade Theater in Los Angeles. She also writes and performs in a sketch group with other LA comics. Last spring, Kat got the attention of media and audience alike at the Women in Comedy Festival in Boston where she took home the 2011 Friars Club Audience Award. She also performed in the 2011 Out of Bounds Comedy Festival in Austin and the 2011 Laugh Track Festival in Denver. She was just recently a finalist in the 2012 Magners Comedy Festival.
Read More

Tickets Are Up, Workshops Are Open!
by Liz McKeon - 0

Tickets for all WICF 2012 shows are now on sale on the schedule page. Workshops are available for enrollment on the workshop page. Get 'em while they're hot. The future of comedy is here, folks.


Read More

February 27, 2012

A really scary thing happened to me last night at a comedy show
by Liz McKeon - 0

Reblogged with permission from Gaby Dunn. Gaby is a WICF  2012 performer.
 
Part of me thinks it’s too soon to be writing about this because I don’t think I’ve completely processed how I feel, but I also think maybe this has happened to other women and I should talk about it in as raw a way as possible. I’m still really embarrassed and ashamed and garbled up inside, but maybe this can start a helpful discussion in terms of women and comedy.

Last night, I was on a stand up show in the East Village. The show started out with a small crowd and the host did an amazing job interacting with them and riling them up. By the time I got on stage, there were about 20 or so more people in the audience and the place had really filled up. The show was still kind of loose because of the back and forth between the host and the audience, so when I got on stage, I riffed a bit about the stuff that had happened before and then talked to one guy on the side of the audience who the host had dubbed “Banana Republic.” All joke-y. All in good fun.

Then, I start my actual set and do my first two jokes, which go pretty okay. I start another joke that is vaguely sexual - not crude, not crass - mainly silly and that goes well too. The next joke I do is about my boyfriend.

At a comedy show, when you’re on stage, usually you can’t see the audience because of the bright lights. So I’m looking into pitch darkness. As I start the joke, someone yells, “Does your boyfriend know?” referring to the sexuality joke I’d just told. I stop, laugh and say that he does because I think it’s just more of the loose environment that’s been going on at this show. I attribute it to an audience member just having fun. I start to tell the joke about my boyfriend again, and at the midway point, the same voice yells something else derogatory about my boyfriend, homophobic and misogynistic towards me. I stop, confused. I can’t see who is talking to me so I make a HUGE mistake and say, “Sir, if you’re gonna talk to me, you need to come to the front because I can’t see you.” I think calling him out like this will shut him up.

NOPE. Instead, he marches to the front and now I see he’s a TERRIFYING looking crazy man I hadn’t noticed in the crowd. He comes way too close to the stage and in my fear, I gesture that he needs to sit in the front, not come on stage with me which seems to be his plan. He sits and continues talking to me, making gross, lewd comments, leering, ruining all my jokes and at one point, he takes out a digital camera and creepily asks if I want to see some photos.

I am horrified. He’s completely derailed the act I’ve worked hard on, ruined a night of me doing my job which I’d spent all day looking forward to (and I’d waited an hour to get on stage), embarrassed me and made me feel worthless in front of my friends at the show and my fellow comics and is really, really scaring me.

(Relevant note: I am the only female comic on this show and before me, nothing had happened. I become aware that this is a clear sexist attack.)

When he first started talking, I had tried to do that thing women are taught to do where you’re distantly polite to a man who is attacking you in the hopes that things don’t escalate. “Just smile and make a joke so he doesn’t hurt you.”

Part of me is so sick of that line of thinking. Even though I’m still scared, I mock him a bit saying he hangs outside the CVS all day and telling him I know he’s just going to show me pictures of his dick on that camera, basically joking that he’s a crazy Internet creeper come to life. The audience laughs and is on my side, but it’s very, very uncomfortable and I am visibly unnerved. The more upset I get, the more he grins a disgusting, slimy grin at me. I wish I were braver.

Finally, I say, “Sir. I’m going to do my last joke and it’s going to be great and you’re going to shut the fuck up, okay?” He nods, but then as I start my joke, he yells more horrible stuff at me. I put the mic back in the stand and say, “Now, because of you, no one’s gonna hear the punchline of that joke.” Then, I get off stage.

By the time I reach the back, the two people in charge of the show have grabbed the guy and kicked him out of the show. The host gets back up and has the audience boo loudly against hecklers and cheer for me. In the back of the room, all the other comics come up and hug me and make sure I’m okay. I am shaking. Outside of the showroom is the actual bar attached to the venue. I peek through the curtain of the room and I already know what I’m going to find.

The creepy guy is waiting for me at the bar.

There is no way for me to get to the door without him seeing me. I am supposed to meet my boyfriend at a cafe four blocks away, but if I walk out alone, he’ll follow me. I am trapped. I text my boyfriend that he needs to walk to this venue and get me. I feel so worthless and stupid that I need to do that, that I can’t take care of myself. I don’t see any way for me to lose the guy if he comes after me though. My boyfriend says he’ll be there in five.

It’s the longest five minutes of my life. The heckler spots me and I don’t know what to do. I pace around the room, hide in the comedians’ area, and try and disappear into a corner. Eventually, I decide to try standing outside because maybe there will be people there and he won’t try and get me. There’s not enough people outside, and I realize this was a bad choice. I consider calling the police but I don’t know what they can do. 

I know he’s waiting to follow me out of the bar as soon as I walk away. He’s going to hurt me.

I stand outside for a bit, clutching my phone. I can see the guy waiting inside the bar. Finally, my boyfriend gets there. I grab his hand and walk away as the door to the bar opens and the creep yells after me, “Byyyyye.” I don’t acknowledge it, but it feels like a bullet.

My boyfriend and I turn the corner. I start to sob.

“I wish I were stronger,” I tell him. “I wish I could have punched the guy or done more, but I was so scared because he was bigger than me and he looked like he was really going to abduct me, rape me and kill me.”

(Later, my friend who was at the show says I did the right thing running away because “that guy looked like he had a knife collection he wanted to show you.”)

Right now, I feel: beaten, destroyed, helpless, weak, ashamed for being so scared, shocked, worthless, less than, and terrified. I feel like maybe I overreacted but then it’s that concept of Schrodinger’s Rapist, where I don’t know what would have happened. I also feel like I never want to do comedy again - which I guess is sort of…letting the terrorists win so to speak, but I don’t know.

The three male comics I talked to about this said they’d been heckled before but nothing on this level. I suspect I can’t be the only female comic who’s felt threatened by an audience member, but I’ve never heard of anything like this before what happened to me last night.

Anyway, maybe I’ll be more eloquent about this at a time when I feel more eloquent. But for now, I just needed to get this all down somewhere. Fuck, man. Fuck.
Read More

Erin Jackson's Opinions Are in the Sunday 'Times'
by Liz McKeon - 0

By WICF Editor Liz McKeon

Erin Jackson took part in this Sunday's New York Times "Room for Debate" column, debating the question "Are People Getting Dumber?" Her answer? "Without a doubt."

And she thinks it's bad for comedy. "[B]eyond that," she writes, "I believe it’s also resulted in a collective inability to discern nuance, interpret social cues, take a joke. Somewhere in between all the LOL’s and J/K’s, we’ve lost our sense of humor."

Read the rest of Erin's opinion piece, "Stupidity Is Funny, but It’s No Joke," and then come watch her host our headlining event with Carol Leifer, featuring Kelly MacFarland, on Saturday, March 25 at 7 PM at the Longy School of Music, and as the featured performer in our headlining event with Wendy Liebman, hosted by Erin Judge, at 9:30 PM.
Read More

February 22, 2012

Geeking Out With ... Joe Bill (Part Three)
by Pam Victor - 0



By WICF Contributor Pam Victor

[“Geeking Out With … ” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like me. The series can be found in the full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog.]


As promised, the last of this geek out trilogy really gets deep down into the succulent, juicy drippings of hardcore improv philosophy. If this prospect doesn’t make your mouth water, you’ve come to the wrong article, baby. Have you missed the previous Joe Bill interviews? Please check out Geeking Out with…Joe Bill” Part One, in which we explore the roots of Joe’s improv life, and Part Two, in which we discuss AnnoyanceTheatre and BASSPROV. But if you’re ready to send your nerdazoid improv brain into a quivering mass of thrilling neuro-electrical firings, grab a warm drink and a cookie, and dive with me into Joe Bill’s philosopher mind.
***

PAM: It’s hard for us to talk about improv without also talking about vaginas. [This is in reference to a WICF article Joe contributed to entitled “Should You Improvise More with Your Vagina?”] Can you talk about why the Spirit of the Vagina Goddess is so important to summon when improvising?

JOE: If you're going to do long form or scenic improvisation, you need your feminine sensibility, or "vagina," with you if you aspire to playing with any depth of character and/or emotion. Your feminine sensibility is right-brained and process-driven and always connected to the whole in which we all are a party of the same thing. The opposite is true for your masculine sensibility or "throbbing, relationship-discounting cock," which is useful in short form, comedy and stand-up, and always sees us as separate entities that are relative to each other in premise (part of the same thing). And it's THAT disparity in perception that causes so much angst and drama in improv.

PAM: But you still would prefer to watch “hermaphrodites” perform
(so to speak)?

JOE: I would ABSOLUTELY prefer to watch, literally or figuratively, hermaphrodites perform.

PAM: Hahaha. You “like to watch.”

JOE: Sure...half of me does, the other half...well...what the show concept?

PAM: LOL! Ok, talk to me about the dichotomy of improv. I mean, we’ve talked about the dick/pussy spectrum. How does all that interweave with the game-based/scenic improv spectrum?

JOE: I love honest, emotion-driven dialogue that finds its way to funny that's uncovered through the interaction - but really, I love any style of improv that's done well and passionately. I use "ruthlessly playful and playfully ruthless" a lot...that's a big criteria for my enjoyment of any style of improv.

PAM: Hey! You foresaw one of my interview questions about that lovely Joe Bill-ism, “Be ruthlessly playful and playfully ruthless”! How do we employ this bon mot on stage?

Joe Bill
playing with his feminine sensibility
JOE: Game and comedy is a masculine proposition, and is left brain driven, by and large. Scenic is based in emotional honesty and evolution of character. “Ruthlessly playful and playfully ruthless” is the marriage of both sensibilities in my mind, and allows a ton of variation or varying weights being given to either side, depending on the night. If I'm improvising with UCB [Upright Citizen’s Brigade] friends, I want to honor game of the scene, but it doesn't mean I can't play emotionally. I just might lead into a scene a little differently than I would a mono-scene. AND I do allow my left brain to indulge the UCB mantra, "If this is true, then what else is true" because I believe it's a great note, and I’m still finding it helpful and useful to me in terms of integrating well under that roof, and also growing as an improviser. It's been very useful integrating that into my teaching over the last 5-6 years too. I remember when [Matt] Besser first mentioned the concept to me at a Del Close Festival, and just thinking, "Wow. That's going to take this approach over the top." And I think it has, in the best way. And it's useful to ME because I have a very strong feminine sensibility, so that's one way I personally employ and adapt playful/ruthless on stage. Does that make sense? It informs and focuses my "ruthless" when I play at UCB.

I also used the opposite in Germany with the [Keith] Johnstone crowd! I ran a DeMaat with eight of us. It's simply names of improvisers in a receptacle, then two get drawn out and have 30 seconds to decide on a suggestion to take for a longer, in this case 12-15 minute, relationship scene. You play the same characters and just play people that are dealing with each other. I think, in the Theater Sports-Micetro world of Johnstone, they rarely if ever get to have that long together, uninterrupted, and play characters that are just connecting in a one scene fishbowl. The show was four scenes in an hour, and it absolutely killed.

PAM: It's quite amazing to me - though not entirely surprising given our shared passion for the field, I guess - that you continue to be challenged and grow after 30+ years of improvising. In fact, one of the things I love most about improv is its endless fount of challenges - I mean, talk about a life's work that...well...lasts a whole lifetime! But are you still challenged by it? It still interests you to perform?

JOE: I love performing, and the challenges are subtler, usually. Also, the challenges are both more varied and absolutely still the same - kind of like having to relearn the same lessons, over and over again. For the most part it's just constantly a proposition of being present and listening, in any context.

PAM: Being present and listening - THAT is a lesson that would take a lifetime.

JOE: Yes, it does.

PAM: We always are told to play to the top of our character’s intelligence. How do you think that rule is often misunderstood?

JOE: It’s the most overrated rule in improv. It's become trite and meaningless, beyond "don't play a palsy or a retard" (two directions that would be just as offensive to me as the “top of your intelligence” note, if I had the capacity to be offended). Really, it means, at its best, your character knows what you know...unless it doesn't...see?

It’s misunderstood because it's fairly meaningless and not very actionable.
It also keeps teachers teaching improv, along with all of the other bullshit "Don't" notes.

PAM: There is an interesting dynamic going on in the improv world right now, and with all your travels you’re in a unique position to be very familiar with pretty much all of the major – and even less major – improv theaters out there right now. Upright Citizen’s Brigade Theatre seems to favoring finding the game of the scene and playing it fast and furiously; whereas, a lot of other theaters maintain the conviction in a more leisurely development of scenic improv. First of all, am I reading this trend correctly? Is it a division between UCB and, well, everyone else?

JOE: Not really. I think UCB has done the best job of articulating their context and purpose. "We will improvise in a way that when our scenes are finished, we can transcribe them and they would look like perfect sketch comedy scripts." I mean, it's a genius approach to melding improvisation and comedy, and they've articulated, in my opinion, the empirical approach to that style. The promise is comedy, period. Not drama, not emotional exchange to create compelling relationships that have characters evolve theatrically, emotionally over the span of a production...just, sketch comedy, improvised. 

I consider myself a UCB guy, like an old uncle from the old country, and I think they get their balls busted for their approach because from a psychological perspective (think NLP - Neuro Linguistic Programming
 - here all you psych nerds!) the approach isn't going to come naturally or easily for 2/3 of all people, based on their learning style.

PAM: Because its success is based on a person's inherent funny-ness and thus can't be learned?

JOE: No, because only about 28% of improvisers/people have a preference/aptitude for auditory learning. (Bumps glasses higher onto nose, then offers quizzical glance to you).

PAM, member of the other 77%: (Tries to write it down so I can understand it.) What do you make of this dynamic in regards to the development of improv as an art form? Are we going to divide into camps or is one style going to take a more mainstay, leading position?

JOE: I think that most improv theaters aren't nearly as successful in articulating their context and what they're doing. Which, if you think about it, makes sense where improv is concerned, especially since the farther away from comedy/masculine/goal context you move down the spectrum towards theatrical/feminine/process approach, the more, by definition, you move from a specific focus towards allowing different possibilities into your process. To limit those possibilities is to indulge in a masculine approach to managing your creation and by definition compromises the creativity of the people inside of the process.

It's essentially why improv rules that begin with the word "Don't" are largely unhelpful bullshit once you're a week removed from learning them.

PAM: Although Chicago-trained players have traditionally had a huge impact on mainstream comedy (e.g., SNL), it seems like UCB players are hitting the movie and TV industry in a major way right now. The League and Childrens Hospital are both TV shows that come directly from UCB players who don’t have their roots in Chicago (unlike, say, Rob Riggle and Amy Poehler). Their style tends to be very quick, very young, a bit crude and less deep in character and plot development. What impact do you think this trend might have on improv stylistically?

JOE: It's already affected improv because everything is veering towards quicker and funnier. Audiences would rather receive ten hand jobs in an hour, rather than one or two hand jobs and the feeling that they are a part of something greater because they've received that hand job or two in the way they did that night.

PAM: ::sound of truck backing up:: I cannot stop myself from going there, Joe. Sorry, I tried to restrain myself, but I just can't... Are you saying that UCB/masculine-style improv is equivalent to a hand job? (Not even a blow job?) If so, what would the other end of the spectrum be akin to?

JOE: I'm saying that ALL comedy is equivalent to getting hand jobs, and the more the better...COMEDY is masculine! What’s more masculine than the goal of blowing a nut? That's what laughter is. And, really, ComedySportz is the most like hand jobs. UCB is more like a house of fetishes, where any fetish can be indulged: "...and if you like a feather in your ass, then what else is true about you, you kinky fuck?" ComedySportz has about the same delivery system whereever you go - the ones that do it best though know how to get saliva into the equation...or something like that.

So, how to be a better whore?

PAM: Whoa nelly. Comedy is masculine? C'mon, Joe. Discovery improv is some of the best stuff out there.

JOE: FUCK YES. Masculine doesn't give a fuck HOW, with goals, it's about expediting and efficiency.

PAM: TJ & Dave are not “blowing a nut,” Joe.

JOE: They are theater that is comedic. They are playing for truth first, comedy second. They are a feminine show.

PAM: Yet still comedy.

JOE: Yes, but the comedy is a consequence, not a goal. There's no "trying," only being.

PAM: You forgot to add "grasshoppah." [I wiffed on the Star Wars reference and mixed metaphors with The Karate Kid – Joe was gracious however.]

JOE: AND, that's not all the time. We all fall into whoring, we're human...grasshoppah. Audiences only laugh at clowns that "try," not at improvisers, actors or comics. "Comedy" means a promise of laughter.
Laughter is ALWAYS a consequence of tension being broken. When we laugh a LOT, we often say we have seen great comedy.

PAM: Laughter also is a consequence of doing the predictable - and recognition of the familiar - in my opinion.

JOE: You've said the same thing. It can't be predictable, without the tension of pattern being served. "Creating tension and breaking tension as many times as possible in a given period of time" = great comedy = compulsive masturbation.

PAM: It all comes down to sex with you.

JOE: HAH! POT. KETTLE. Me ‘n You - BLACK!

PAM: Hahahaha!

JOE: Familiarity + Presentation context = Tension

PAM: I think it may be a worrisome moment in my evolution as a comedian that in some ways I am becoming less and less interested in making the audience laugh.

JOE: 1.) Fuck the audience. Their enjoyment will be a consequence of your skill and focus.

PAM: All of them? Or just the cute ones in the front row? (Oops, guess I am still sort of a cheap laughter 'ho.)

JOE: 2.) Improvisers are usually not funny or compelling if they don't know who they are in the scene/moment.

3.) NEVER literally fuck an audience member on the night of the show!

(beat)

Seriously.

(beat)

Wait at least a day.

PAM: Roger that.

JOE: (I've not always adhered to this advice, that's why I can give it. But THAT'S another interview about stalkers.)

4.) Practice BEING present in the moment in games.

5.) In scenes, knowing HOW you are is knowing WHO you are...so get that out of the way in the first 15 seconds. Decide or discover an emotional POV [point of view] to play and experience the world through.

But the thing is, if you're promising comedy, then it's about what you're prepared to DO to serve the promise of facilitating laughter, and ALSO of supporting and building the tension, scenically, so that there are emotional, and hopefully universal stakes rooted in the human condition that are felt by the entire room when Grandpa fucks the cancer-riddled daughter's wedding cake at the reception (for example).

PAM: OMG. Hahahaha! That answer was the most amazing combination of intellect and crass baseness. And I thank you for that.

Ok, next on the agenda. I've heard you promoting your "curiosity or suspicion" suggestion as a go-to for scene work. I want to understand it better, so it works its way into my muscles and bones. Can you explain it a little more for me and maybe provide an example on how it works for you?

JOE: So here's the deal, curiosity and suspicion are kind of step two. Step one is deciding or discovering an emotional point of view in the scene through which you take in the world around you. You project that emotion in order to listen through it. Make sense? This is the world of, “Knowing how you are is knowing who you are.”

So now, if you know how you feel, then each line that's uttered in the scene, each point of environment that's engaged, is an opportunity to discover for yourself and reflect to your scene partner (and to the audience, though, in pure scenic moments between characters, we are not in consideration of the audience) the journey of "how you are."

Let's say you begin with a typically "negative emotion," jealousy. YOU. ARE. JEALOUSY. The jealousy then will listen to whatever your scene partner says to you in two ways:

1.)  Literally, to the sense of the words. And those words either heighten or ease the circumstances surrounding your jealousy. (This is beginning and intermediate improvisation.)

And, 2.) Interpersonally. That is HOW the words have been delivered, the tone, the pacing, the inflection and so forth. HOW the other person’s EMOTION is conveyed and received THROUGH YOUR EMOTION. (Here we go!)

SO, if we are rockin’ and present in the scene, we don't need the tip, because it's happening anyway. This is called "good acting.” But if it's not, if the connection isn't really there because the characters aren't allowing the other to affect them, then Jealousy may experience the ENERGY of the other character through Curiosity (if perhaps the other energy is coming into alignment with you in that moment) or Suspicion (if it's coming into conflict in that moment).

And remember, Listening is a willingness to change. The ACTING happens during the willingness...what does "willingness" look like? What does Jealousy's "willingness to change" look like? Those are the left brain questions, but the right brain, the interpersonal listening, is playing off of the emotional cues you pick up from your scene partner and allowing them to work on you, moment to moment, with "honesty." And in a sense, the "working on you" is just "listening" and acknowledging that each successive moment has either greater alignment or conflict than the proceeding moment.


This creates the illusion that we are "affecting each other" and may lead us to that actual sensation, so we can resume playing the moments "honestly" and without an agenda like thinking about curiosity and suspicion in our exchange.
Joe in BASSPROV

PAM (whose brain has exploded): So what are you working on right now? I need to tell people how they can see you. This would be the place you plug anything you want to.

JOE: Finishing my book. It's done, I mean the editing and prepping the first-read doc. for people. I think it'll be called "Improvisation: A Moment Embraced," but through recording, a dark horse title has come up that I can't let go of:

PAM (interrupting): It's going to be about masturbation, isn't it?

JOE: "Hey Mister, Why You Jerking Off That Giraffe?: A Chronicle of Improvisation.”

PAM: I CALLED IT, MOTHERFUCKER!!! Hahahaha!

JOE: There's a story behind it…those words were uttered by Ed Furman, and yes, predictably, YOU CALLED IT! (But did that yield laughter?)

PAM: That is a really, really tough choice between those two titles. I know which one I would buy, but you had better poll a higher-minded audience than I.

JOE: I know. I know.

PAM: Any predictions when the book might come out?

JOE: Depending on how/if I self-publish, Spring? Or by my birthday, May 1st?


PAM: And take the last two minutes to plug your current shows where people might have a good chance of seeing you regularly perform in Chicago.


JOE: Armando on Monday nights at iO ChicagoDeltones on one or two Saturdays a month at iO Chicago. Chicago Improv Festival, last full week of April, probably the next time BASSPROV plays in Chicago

***

Dear reader,
in case you missed it,
please allow me to leave you with a review
of one of my favorite bon mots that Joe reminded us of:
Listening is a willingness to change.”
Use it in a scene…and with someone you love.





Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she producesThe Happier Valley Comedy Shows in Northampton, MA. Pam directs, produces and performs in the hot, new comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog,"My Nephew is a Poodle."
Read More