Latest News

April 25, 2012

Geeking Out with...Susan Messing (Part One)
by Pam Victor - 0


By WICF Contributor Pam Victor

[“Geeking Out with…” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like Pam. The series can be found in full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog.]



If you could use three words to describe Susan Messing, what would they be?

The "loving, fearless, talented"
Susan Messing
“Loving, fearless, talented.”
-Tim Meadows (Saturday Night Live, Uncle's Brother)

“Well, it will be hard to sum up my friend Susan in 3 words...
I'll try but I will make it 6 with adjectives:
Fiercely Loyal
Endlessly Generous

Beautifully Imaginative.”
-Kate Duffy (iO Theater, The Second City)

“Lovely, vulgar, original.”
-TJ Jagodowski (TJ & Dave)

“Brilliant, caring, fearless.”
-Mark Sutton (BASSPROV)

“Wild, silly, playful and loving.”
 – Jet Eveleth (iO Theater)


"Generous, Intuitive, & Original."
- Jake Schneider (iO, ComedySportz, Second City)

“Ebullient, welcoming, sincere, and if I had one more – fearless.”
 - Angela V. Shelton (Frangela)

“Mama Chicago Improv"
 – Jonathan Pitts 
(Executive Director, Chicago Improv Festival Productions) 
Jonathan continues, “She hates when I say that, but after Joyce Sloane (the original Mama Chicago Improv) passed away, I say the crown passed to Susan. She's one of the few people who is beloved by every improv theatre and training center in Chicago.”

Most likely, if I continued to poll her friends and colleagues, I would hear piles and piles of more love, respect, and admiration for all that is Susan Messing. But I'll stop myself from polling further because I fear Susan might tell me to relax my crack and stop being so fucking OCD about collecting bullshit quotes about her. (Though I do hope she smiles secretly into her coffee in private pleasure after reading them.) As she said to me after listening to me rub raw my improv musings, “There's just too many cool things to rape, dear goodness, my poor mommy.” Be still my heart - that woman is speakin’ my language. As our interview progressed, I quickly could see why her peers love and respect her so much. Yes, she is all of the above, and much, much more. Ladies and gentlemen, the incomparable Susan Messing!

Susan Messing has been improvising in Chicago for well over two decades
, and was adorned the title of "Funniest Woman in Chicago" by Chicago MagazineSusan has performed, taught and/or directed at all the major theaters including The Second City, iO Theater and The Annoyance Theater. One of the founding members of The Annoyance Theatre, Susan performed as Cindy in their break out hit The Real Live Brady Bunch as well as adapted and directed the critically acclaimed What Every Girl Should Know... An Ode to Judy Blume, plus something like a wadzillion other shows. She currently performs weekly at The Annoyance in Messing with a Friend, and monthly at The Second City with her three-woman show The PlayboysSusan also is an adjunct professor for  DePaul University's Theatre School, and The University of Chicago. She continues to teach at The Annoyance, occasionally at Second City and iO, and will be teaching at Steppenwolf Theatre this summer as well.


***


PAM VICTOR: Tell me about the first seed of improv that was planted in your heart.

SUSAN MESSING: I was at Northwestern- sophomore year- and I auditioned for their comedy show, The Meow Show. The producer that year was some English guy named Dan Patterson - ended up being the Whose Line is it Anyway? founder. Whatever. I sucked.

Then junior year, there was some sort of audition for an improv group in Chicago at a place called ImprovOlympic. Again, I wasn't cast. But when I graduated with a B.S. (bullshit) in Theatre, and I was still a terrible actress, my thoughts came around again to that place and I started taking classes there. [That was] 1986.
The first three guys I met were Rich Laible, Dave Razowsky, and Mick Napier. My life kind of changed forever.

PAM: It seems like that time, that era, in Chicago was a golden time. I mean, there were so many people who just came together and...stuck.

SUSAN: Yup. Looking back, it was incredible. These people now run comedy. Seriously. However, at the time, we were just fucking around, trying to be the best performers we could be, getting fucked up, and laughing. Pretty incredible in retrospect.

I wrote incredible twice. So it must have been pretty great.

PAM: LOL!

SUSAN: And we had no idea how much our work would blow up. We were just hanging out, making up fun shit.

Sometimes it makes me sad that people have quite the agenda now in their work. I always felt that having more fun than anyone made great work happen with great results. But then again, it was a different time.

PAM: Is there even a space in Chicago these days for people who just want to have fun and make stuff up?

SUSAN: Yes. I don't care what peoples' reasoning is for doing it. If they just want to be famous, that's nice, but know that you can also get famous for killing a busload of kids. Know that I don't recommend that.

PAM: Hahahaha. Exactly.

SUSAN: There is always a space for doing anything, including this work, primarily for joy. Sure. Frankly, I think it makes the ride much easier.

PAM: I do improv because I have to or I would wither on the vine. Why do you do improv?

SUSAN: It's my favorite way to create and I get to play. Simple.

And I have brilliant friends and I get to make up shit with them and then it's over.
And then I get to do it again. Forever.

PAM: What a blessing. 

Would you consider Mick Napier to be the first real guiding force for your development as an improviser?

SUSAN: Well, Charna [Halpern] was my first teacher and then John Harrizal, Del - and Mick was my first coach and one of my first teachers. I think Mick's influence on me was his style of comedy. It made so much sense to me, twisted, perverse, uncensored...

All of my teachers, including Don DePollo, Michael Gellman, John Michalski, Cary Goldenberg, had some sort of influence on me, but Mick's comic sensibilities spoke to me. And of course, I was completely influenced by the brilliant talent of my friends. I have always just felt lucky not to get kicked offstage. I think I'll always feel that way.

PAM: So which friends are you referring to from back then?

SUSAN: Shit. They're all great. I don't want to make it sound like I'm dropping names. Look at iO, The Annoyance and Second City and mix and match from 1986 - present. Seriously. I've either played with them, cried with them, partied with them, slept with them...

PAM: Ha. Ok. What improv philosophies do you feel you learned from Mick Napier that continue to serve you well today?

SUSAN: The best way to take care of your partner is to take care of yourself so they don't have to worry about you. The first three seconds of the scene is your promise to the audience of WHO you will be. You don't know what the scene is until the fucker's over. That if you're onstage you belong there...

And he's had such a sense of play and whimsy in this shit that I couldn't help but agree with it all. And it works.

I love iO and Second City too...However, I think through time we've turned this shit into rocket science and that can get to be too much. Improv is no longer your bastard cousin of creation. It's everywhere and used for all sorts of creative shit, and it's pretty amazing at how legit it's become in the artistic world. I never thought that today I'd be teaching and performing all over the place, including universities. Odd.

Charna spoke to the CERN people - the fancy particle physicists - I mean what the fuck, right???

PAM: Wow. One of my mentors, Will Luera, is what I consider to be an improv physicist, so actually that makes perfect sense to me. Plus - and forgive me if this is too woo-woo for you - I actually think the lessons from improv are all the very best lessons for living a good life.

SUSAN: Absolutely.

PAM: So it is a relief to me that smart people are looking to improv for guidance.

SUSAN: Sure.

PAM: But what the fuck did the CERN people want from iO?

SUSAN: These fuckers hate each other. Each one thinks the others' ideas are for shit. So no one collaborates. But out of one "shit" idea can come brilliance. The "shit" idea might ultimately be dropped, but it got the ball rolling. So we agree and add and there you go...even particle physicists.

PAM: Especially particle physicists.

SUSAN: Go figure.But everyone comes out with a little more focus, maybe more compassion for others, and comedy's a brilliant, brilliant teaching tool for everyone, whether you want to be a comedian or not.

PAM: Tell me about The Annoyance back in the day. Seems like it was crazyfuncrazy.

SUSAN: The Annoyance used to be referred to as "The Island of Misfit Toys”…It was a freak show…irreverent and uncensored. That's not a right as a comedian; that's a luxury. And when you walk into the Annoyance, the comedy is completely protected in that you can do and say whatever you want. There are few places in the world that let you do that, and you don't take that lightly. If comedy isn't protected, the audience doesn't feel like they can laugh, and that's not very good when you're doing comedy.

PAM:  So just set your history straight for me. Your first formal improv training and experience was at iO? You land first in Charna's lap?

SUSAN: Uh huh,and it was the perfect place to land. I'm so glad that I started it all at ImprovOlympic with her, John, and Del. And then I worked with a group called Metraform at the same time, which became the Annoyance, while I was studying at Second City. And then, twelve years later I did Mainstage at Second City.

PAM: Good grief, woman. How absolutely lovely.

SUSAN: It certainly didn't suck.

PAM: Sorry. I just got stalled by a moment of reverence.

SUSAN: In retrospect it's pretty insane but at the time it made perfect sense to me. And I don't think I would have or could have done it any other way. I'm way grateful for the ride.

Susan Messing


PAM: Gratitude is the key word.



SUSAN: Always.





PAM: Ok, back to your first years at iO. It sounds like you and Charna have had a pretty rollercoastery relationship, which must have been really tough since she had the keys to the kingdom at the time (and still does). It seems like she was HARD on you, Susan. What helped you stick it out while other women were quitting?

SUSAN: I was a masochist and I knew that one day I'd be able to do it. Charna gave me the hard note. And I had no spine but that's ok. She's one of my VERY best friends now, but at the time...

PAM: Wait a minute. You can't have no spine but still have the conviction to stick it out. (Ok, maybe you can, but...)

SUSAN: Masochist.

PAM: Really? You liked that she was being hard on you?

SUSAN: Not in the literal translation, no. I'm sure it would have been MUCH easier had she liked me; but even if the messenger was a tough ass, the message was good. And it didn't kill me, and I developed a spine.

She's much mellower on her students now.

PAM: That’s a relief! What was she giving you such a hard time about?

SUSAN: You know what? I have no fucking idea.

PAM: Ha!

SUSAN: All I know is that when I was put as "the girl" on the "D" team that became Blue Velveeta, they treated me like a gem and automatically I was a gem to them, so there you go. Mick was our coach and he was brilliant, and all of a sudden my work was like night and day.

PAM: You flourished with the support.

SUSAN: I think that positive reinforcement seems to work better than negative. Some would disagree. I don't give the rough notes unless someone can handle it or is fucking up the dynamic so much that you've got to deal with it. And I'm not interested in embarrassing people in front of others. I've always felt that it's MY job to adjust MY semantics so that THEY'LL get it.

Look, my ride is different from others - many people flourish from equal and opposite direction - and I could only be who I was at the time that I was that.

PAM: Amen.

SUSAN: I try to give people a break or the benefit of the doubt until I can't, and then I rip new assholes and take no prisoners.

PAM: LOL.  You worked with Del Close for many years, and it seems like he was instrumental in your development as an improviser. What was it about Del that made him such a powerful teacher and guide?

SUSAN: Del didn't teach me as much as he AFFIRMED me. When I had his approval, it meant the world to me. I throw the word "brilliant" around a lot, but he really was, and since there was no fucking way that I could even have a decent exchange of ideas with him because he was so so so damn smart, I just chose to love him and he loved me back. People kind of forgot he was human because he was such an icon, so I approached him a little differently than maybe most people. He seemed intimidating but I kind of ignored that.

And I miss him.

PAM: I bet. Tell me who Del was to you. Was his softer with you than with other people, do you think?

SUSAN: Definitely. I don't think that many people hugged the guy. People were very intimidated by him. He could give you a note in class that made you wish the floor opened up and swallowed you, but I tried to ignore that. I don't know. I just found him to be really human, and most people didn't approach him emotionally and that's how I lead. So I kind of broke that barrier, and I'd like to think that he liked that. He was such a good man to me.

PAM: I think that is the most tender description of Del Close I've ever heard.

SUSAN: I just simply loved him. He was a great guy, and although I think he'd be very amused and pleased at how people have made him a sort of comedy god. Underneath it all, he was just a really good man who kind of shut that down a bit later in life, and I refused to keep the door shut.

I have a really cool picture of him from maybe his SC years, and he's vibrant and sly and just an all around groovy guy. I don't think he really lost that in my eyes.

PAM: What lessons about improv do you still carry with you today from Del? (I fear that's a hard question because so much of everyone else's lessons are built on Del's.)

SUSAN: I do believe that it's important to treat each other like artists and heroes and the audience with respect. I do believe you should play at the top of your intelligence; although in character work I think our opinions aren't the same as he didn't really give a shit about character work.

Working together to create immediate brilliance is possible. Improv is not just a means to an end...

...and I love longform so there you go.
"...and I love longform so there you go."
Susan Messing

PAM: Me too.

You have a reputation as an amazing teacher. More than one person has done the “I’m not worthy” hands when describing your teaching style.

SUSAN: Oh dear that's nice. Glad I'm not just shitting into the breeze.

PAM: No, Susan Messing. You are definitely not shitting into the breeze…and if you are, your shit shrapnel has landed all over the land. In a good way.

SUSAN: Aw. That's most sweet.

PAM: What do you enjoy most about teaching improv?

SUSAN: I guess I'm into the epiphany; I like seeing them get it and fly. I like telling them they're right and then making them more right. I like pulling comedy out of commitment and recommitment to their choices. I like supporting them in joy and discovery instead of standing around inventing tiresome clever.

I like good table manners.

I like pretty pictures.

I like them figuring out how they can access their brilliance - and for selfish reasons - it'll only make it easier for me to play with them later on if we happen to meet each other on stage....if I haven't been kicked off yet because they've discovered that I'm a hack.

PAM: You are the most marvelous combination of steely balls and soft, self-depreciator. If you don't mind my saying.

SUSAN: I am not for the faint of heart, but if you can handle the messenger you'll definitely get the message.

PAM: Speaking of your way with words...When I told people that I was interviewing you, they frequently said, “Ask her about the exercise named _______.” (Fill in the blank with a wonderfully profane title.) You are famous for creating great exercises with wicked name. Can you tell me about some of them?

SUSAN: “Doublemint Twins Get Fucked Up the Ass”? “Good Morning Fucko”? That just helps to keep us interested, I guess. I'm an improviser - I'm sure I'll make up something tomorrow with an even more hateful name, but I love that it's entered the general lexicon.

PAM: Ha! What can we learn from “Doublemint Twins Get Fucked Up the Ass”?

SUSAN: Sharing energy. Discovery vs. invention. Listening. Building a scene. Some basics, but the exercise is maddening and frankly the comedy comes from the struggle to do it more than anything. When it's over, they're so happy to have their own opinions back they actually use them. I have a lot of reverse psychology stuck in there.

I was a girl who got to play with boys so I guess people seem to think I play balls out.

***
In the Part Two of my geek out session with Susan Messing,
we expand on the source of Susan’s ability to appear balls out amazing,
discuss the role of motherhood in her approach to improv as well as
mull over many other profane and profound improv topics.

***


Catch up on past improv nerd-a-thons:
Geeking Out with…Chris Gethard of “The Chris Gethard Show”,
 …with Joe Bill of BASSPROV,
 ….with Keisha Zollar of Nobody’s Token,
 …Jet Eveleth of The Reckoning,
and many more!


And "like" the "Geeking Out with..."FACEBOOK PAGE please.



Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she producesThe Happier Valley Comedy Shows in Northampton, MA. Pam directs, produces and performs in the comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog,"My Nephew is a Poodle," where you also can read a lengthier, dorkier version of this interview.


Read More

April 18, 2012

Geeking Out with...Jimmy Carrane
by Pam Victor - 0


By WICF Contributor Pam Victor

[“Geeking Out with…” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like Pam. The series can be found in full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog.]


Jimmy Carrane
If you consider yourself a true improv geek and you’re not yet partaking in great, heady quaffs of the  Improv Nerd with Jimmy Carrane podcast, then you are in for a tasty, satisfying treat. Longtime Chicago improviser, Jimmy Carrane invites his brethren to the stage for a personal, improv-rich conversation followed by a short set together. After which, Carrane and his guests talk out their set and take questions from their savvy audience. His list of guests reads like a recipe of riches, including Tim Meadows, TJ Jagodowski, Dave Pasquesi, Joe Bill and Mark Sutton, Susan Messing, two members of the community pride, Improvised Shakespeare, and a slew of other super talented improvisers. Along the way, listeners may begin to relate to Carrane’s self-doubting persona, which becomes increasingly appealing much the same way that Marc Maron’s humorous self-loathing grows on you (or at least me) in his podcast. As I listen to Carrane’s personal journey, I find myself tuning back in to root for his personal progress as much as for the pearls of improv wisdom dropped by his guests. Either way, damn good listening, folks.

Jimmy Carrane is the co-author with Liz Allen of Improvising Better: A Guide for the Working Improviser. One of the founding members of The Annoyance Theater, Carrane has taught there as well as at The Second City, iO Theatre, and Victory Gardens. Currently, he teaches a popular workshop tantalizingly entitled The Art of Slow ComedyIn addition to many, many improv, theatrical and movie features, Carrane has been a member of the original Armando team at iO, Carl and the Passions, Jazz Freddy, and Naked with Stephanie Weir, which is credited with innovating the monoscene.

***

PAM VICTOR:  Let's start with your improv training. When did you know you wanted to be an improviser?

JIMMY CARRANE: Wow. It’s like this, I started doing it after high school when all my friends went away to college. I went to this place that is no longer here in Chicago called Players Workshop. Everyone went there. And I was pretty much in denial that I wanted to do this for years.
Jazz Freddy

I then went to Second City and then iO - it was called ImprovOlympic - and then over to Annoyance Theater when the was the hot theater in town. That is where I did this one-man show I had written through improv called I’m 27, I Still Live at Home and Sell Office Supplies. That was like the perfect storm. Between the success of the Annoyance and the topic of kids moving in with their parents, I got a lot of national and local press. During that time I was in a wonderful longform group called Jazz Freddy with people like Dave Koechner, Rachel Dratch, Kevin Dorff and Brian Stack. Around that time I also started teaching at the Annoyance.

PAM:  Mmmm! Sounds delicious.

JIMMY: I never had the feeling [that I knew I wanted to be an improviser] until in my forties. And it was like, “I am getting noticed, I can do this.” I broke away from my parents’ expectations, especially my mom’s that I was get a real job in an office with insurance and a 401K.

PAM:  Ugh. I hear that. Recently, I was thinking about parental expectations and improv, and how I could explain to my (Jewish doctor) father that success is not always equated with money.

JIMMY: Improv had a very narrow path back then. It was, "Do iO, get hired by Second City, and then be discovered by SNL." There were not many options. Today, there are many different was to make money doing improv.

I came from a family that did not encourage you to have feelings. It was a typical suburban, dysfunctional family, where the mother stayed at home, neglected the kids and overate, and the father went to prison. We had addiction in our family, which is not new to anyone who is in improv. We learned to deny our feelings, bury them in the backyard, stuff them. So it was dangerous to express yourself. I was a fat, creative, and very sensitive kid – a pretty observant and intuitive kid. Improv helped with that in a way. I am now working in therapy and recovery on how to get in touch with my feelings, which is so important to becoming a better improviser and teacher.

PAM:  Phew. That's quite a journey. Good for you.


Backing up a little, who were your major teachers, the people who you credit with helping you find your voice as an improviser?

JIMMY: In terms of teachers, Martin DeMaat was a huge influence. He was a loving, kind man who was a direct disciple of Spolin. And Del Close, though I never thought he was the best hands-on teacher like Martin was. Del inspired you, and got you to believe that what you were doing was important. The whole “improv is an art form” came from Del. But it’s interesting - studying with Del was like coming from a big, Irish Catholic family of ten kids. When you have that many kids, you all have different experiences. I interviewed both TJ [Jagodowski] and Dave [Pasquesi] for the podcast, and they both had different experiences of Del.

The other thing I got from Del was the whole “truth in comedy”. When I first started at iO doing the Harolds, I loved doing the monologues, when you just tell a real story from your life. And the first couple times I did it and did not embellish anything, just told the truth and got a laugh, I was like, “This is cool. This is so easy.” I love and hate the whole truth in comedy thing...I find it the scariest and most rewarding. Improvisation is a very personal art form. We can see the person through the choices they make. It happens on the unconscious level.

PAM:  In your book Improvising Better, you say that you have a theory that most improvisers come from dysfunctional families. First of all, is this more true that with other types of artists? Secondly, do you know ANYONE – improviser or not – from a “functional” family?

JIMMY: I think a small percentage come from a functional family. I just interviewed Ike Barinholtz and his brother Jon and his Dad were there, so we interviewed them a bit too. I got the sense they came from a very supportive family. Dina Facklis said that her parents were very supportive. I think that there are some people that came from functional families, but I think that is what attracts them to improv, the dysfunction. At least that’s what attracts me.

PAM:  What is it about the dysfunction that is attractive for you? Do you find it therapeutic to improvise?

JIMMY: I grew up in a very chaotic household. People were over at our house 24/7. We were the house where all the kids would want to play because our parents did not have any rules. It was a loud house that was filled with chaos. So working improv theater is like coming home. I feel comfortable in that chaos. I think when I first started out, I was angry all the time in scenes. I feel so much shame for some of the people who played with me because I was not in touch with my anger and the stage was safe palace to express it.

In terms of my teaching, because of being in therapy, I see blocks students have that have nothing do with improv and have to do with some other issue that is interfering with their performing.

PAM:  One of the most useful tips from your book that has stayed with me for years is, “Fucking say thank you” to a compliment from an audience after a show. So…thank you for that, Jimmy Carrane.

JIMMY: That came out of me having such a hard time taking a compliment. It was really more for me than for the readers. I still have a hard time accepting compliments.

So thank you. I am practicing here.

PAM:  Haha! Good job! Thank you for practicing here.

In Improving Better, you re-create your Top Ten Blind Spots for Improvisers workshop. Any new blind spots you’ve noted since the book came out?

JIMMY: I was talking to Dan Bakkedahl the other day, and we were talking about how improvisers dress when they do shows. I don't think you need to wear a suit and tie - that’s overkill - but on the other hand you don't want to look like you just came from the gym or rolled out of bed. It's that kind of a low self-esteem thing. If you don't have respect for yourself, the audience is not going to have respect for you.

PAM: That's a great point. I actually think a lot about that issue. I want to look nice, but I also want to be able to play a homeless person if I have to.

On another topic from your book, I’ve been working a lot lately with how to be/play more vulnerable on stage. Can you explain vulnerability to me a little and how you think players can be more vulnerable? Does the actor need to be vulnerable or the character?

JIMMY: I don't think anyone can be vulnerable until they can slow down. The vulnerably comes in the silence between the two players at the top the scene. The raw connection between the two people on stage in a scene is like a live current of vulnerability. When we speak too much or too quickly we talk away those moments.

In terms of actors or the character, I would say everyone works differently, and how you get there is not important.

PAM:  Ah, slowing down. Explain your course “The Art of Slow Improv” to me please. And take your time because I want to savor every succulent moment.


Jordan Peele, Jimmy Carrane, and Keegan-Michael Key
while doing the Improv Nerd podcast

JIMMY: First of all, this kind of improv is not for everyone. It’s the kind of improv I came up with and the kind of improv I love doing and watching. It’s about making improv easy and taking the pressure off yourself to be funny. People say that it's not about being funny, but then what do they really mean? It means learning to make an emotional connection with your partner. And that comes from silence at the top of the scene. Once you make that connection, you have everything you need in the scene: the relationship, the game, the environment. The one thing that I am proud of with my students is when you come to one of our performances on the last day of class, you believe everything that comes out of their mouths. That is acting. They have a confidence and poise on stage that you don't see in another improvisers. It’s not this frenetic, desperate energy and trying to be funny.

PAM: Tell the people where they can take this class.

JIMMY: They can go to my website at www.jimmycarrane.com or call me at 855-4-IMPROV. I teach in Chicago at Stage 773 and Green Shirt Studio.

PAM:  This is one of the many great quotes from Improvising Better: “The choice is simple: either you can learn the craft that will ultimately make you even funnier, or you can rely solely on your wit and take your chances. Being a good improviser and being funny are not synonymous.” Can you expound on that very apt sentiment please?

JIMMY: It’s really about trust and instant gratification. Are you willing to do the work here and being a journeyman? Or are you looking for what seems like a shortcut? My first several years were about the laugh. That came from insecurity. And then I hit this wall where you aren't doing scenes that can last, and you want to kill yourself after each show. You have hit a creative dead end. So you either quit or take it more seriously, which luckily I did it.

Carrane and Mick Napier at the Improv Nerd podcast
The key to improv is, "Are you willing to keep learning even if you have been doing for a long time?" For me, when you stop learning, it’s miserable and it sucks.


PAM: I love the format of your podcast! For those readers who haven’t yet listened to the Improv Nerd with Jimmy Carrane podcast, after Jimmy interviews his guests, he does a short improv set with them. Then they meet again to discuss the set and take questions from the audience. How did the Improv Nerd podcast get started?

JIMMY: It started at Stage 773 in Chicago, the Brian Posen theater. It’s a wonderful space and great people, where they have Sketch Fest each winter. I have been teaching Art of Slow Comedy classes there, and they had put a ton of money into the new space - it's beautiful - and we talked about doing some sort of show. I had interviewed people on public radio for years in Chicago, and it seemed like a natural progression to do it on stage. It had been suggested to me years before, and I was resistant. I liked what Marc Maron was doing, and I thought if we could get big name improvisers to talk honestly, it could be really helpful and cool at the same time.

PAM: Who are you looking forward to interviewing in the next few months?

JIMMY: Matt Walsh and Rachel Dratch.

PAM: Are there any improvisers who you’re just dying to get on the show, but haven’t been able to manage it yet?

JIMMY: Bill Murray, Jeff Garlin, Eugene Levy, Fred Willard, Amy Poehler, Tina Fey. I would love to get Stephen Colbert, Jane Lynch, Andy Ritcher, Will Ferrell, Adam McKay, Larry David….

PAM: I've noticed that when you interview people, you can be pretty straightforward and blunt about difficult topics, particularly with people who you have known for a long time. A brave move, in my opinion. (One example is TJ Jagodowski's interview.) Is that difficult for you? Are your guests able to separate Jimmy the friend from Jimmy the interviewer, or have there been repercussions after certain interviews?
        
JIMMY: Yes, whenever I ask the more personal question or the blunt question, I feel a ton of shame, so much that I can't use the left side of my body for an hour. It's like I had a shame stroke, and I feel like I am taking advantage of our friendship, and I am an awful person, and I want to kill myself. I have to remember if they don't want to go there with a particular subject, they can take care of themselves. I would say most guests love doing the show, and I take joy in that. What is so cool for me is people feel honored to it and really want to help out. That is Chicago for you. 

PAM: Maybe I’m outing myself as a wimp, but I think the improv part of the podcast is so brave. There you are, talking about the traits of the very best improvisers, presenting yourselves as great teachers (which you are, I know), and then you get up to improvise. How does that not freak you out and put you in a place of instant paralysis?

JIMMY: It does freak me out, but most things freak me out. The improv is the thing I least look forward doing and I am not as free. If I am just doing a improvised longform show somewhere else, I put a lot of pressure on myself. I feel I am responsible for the whole form/show. It's been hard to make that transition, from host to improviser. Like when we had Improvised Shakespeare or Baby Wants Candy, it helps me to say to the guest before the show, "I am really afraid to improvise musical or improvise Shakespeare." When I am honest like that, they are so supported and really take care of me. I have felt really taken care of by the guests. I hope to get better at the improv part of the show. Those darn Chicago improvisers.

PAM: I have to take a moment to give you mad props for the set you did with Improvised Shakespeare. The term “groin oil” is now forever in my lexicon of funny improv inventions. I hope all the readers will listen to that Improv Nerd podcast.

But as your responses here display, and on your show and on your blog, you make no secret of the fact that you suffer from low self-esteem. Or perhaps it’s more apt lately and honorable to say you fight low self-esteem. On Improv Nerd, it actually seems to be becoming a bit of a persona that may have the effect of making you more likeable to many listeners….which, ironically, makes your show more popular, thus potentially raising your self-esteem. Are you ready to play the role of a Jimmy Carrane who doesn’t have a constant loop of self-criticism playing in his head? (I, for one, am pulling for you on that front...I mean, who doesn't love a good "underdog prevails" story?)

Tim Meadows and Jimmy Carrane
take the stage on Improv Nerd
JIMMY: The biggest thing that has helped my self-esteem is the number of “likes” on Improv Nerd Facebook page. I feel like it is extension of my teaching. One thing I wanted to accomplish in this show was to let people know that people in comedy are filled with self-doubt some times. That's the one thing I loved about the Tim Meadows and TJ interviews so much. Here are two people who have achieved a huge amount of success, and they still struggle on some level…because it is not easy for any of us, and that is where the hope lies.  Also, it important for me to be as honest as I can be. This helps the guests to be honest.

In terms of the low self-esteem going away, it's been hard to let go. I feel if I let go, I will let go of my comedy and I will have nothing to say. I know it’s pretty stupid, but right now I feel like I have lost my comic voice. Maybe I am finding it with the podcast. I don't know.


***
Catch up on past improv geek outs:
Geeking Out with…Chris Gethard of “The Chris Gethard Show”,
 …with Joe Bill of BASSPROV,
 ….with Keisha Zollar of Nobody’s Token,
 …Jet Eveleth of The Reckoning,
and many more!



Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she producesThe Happier Valley Comedy Shows in Northampton, MA. Pam directs, produces and performs in the comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog,"My Nephew is a Poodle," where you also can read a lengthier, dorkier version of this interview.

Read More

April 4, 2012

Geeking Out with...Jonathan Pitts
by Pam Victor - 0


By WICF Contributing Writer Pam Victor

[“Geeking Out with…” is a series of interviews with well-known, highly experienced improvisers. It’s a chance to talk about stuff that might interest hardcore, improv dorkwads like Pam. The series can be found in full frontal geek out version on My Nephew is a Poodle and in pithier version on the Women in Comedy Festival blog.]



Mr. Jonathan Pitts
Mostly likely, you will not hear the words “Chicago” and “festival” together without also hearing the name Jonathan Pitts. In 1998, he and Frances Callier (Frangela) founded the Chicago Improv Festival, which Jonathan has been spearheading ever since. As the Executive Director of Chicago Improv Festival Productions, Jonathan also created and runs the College Improv Tournament, The Teen Comedy Fest, and CIF’s education outreach programs. In addition, Jonathan founded Storybox, which is, as he describes it, “an improvised one-act production that combines Story Theater, Noh Theatre, and Viewpoints.” Jonathan also has worked as the guest artist at the Second City Training Company for over eleven years. Jonathan has performed in innumerable improv and theater productions, and for three consecutive years he was named by New City magazine as one of “Chicago Theater’s 50 Leading Characters.” You can't deny Jonathan Pitts has got some mad cred for sure.
***

PAM VICTOR: When did you know you wanted to be an improviser?

JONATHAN PITTS:  I was in college when I first started taking improv classes. I then turned it into a class project and put together a college ensemble for my college to tour local high schools and to perform for our college. I ended up getting additional credit and a grade for my efforts. I remember standing on the stage after performing for 45 minutes in front of a sold out house on our college campus, and realizing, "This is what I want to do with the rest of my life."

PAM:  Ah. And did you do improv from then on? Or was your path to Chicago more circuitous?

JONATHAN:  I first began with classes at Second City in Chicago. It was very different back then, as there was no Second City training center, no Second City ETC, no iO, no Annoyance, no ComedySportz, and very few places to learn or play. This also meant that there were far less improvisers around in Chicago too. Back then, if you got into a SC workshop, it would meet twice a week for 13 weeks. Two hours on Thursday and four hours on Saturday. It was more of an apprenticeship style of learning.

As I was drawn more and more to doing improv, I put together groups with friends and we'd do one-off shows wherever we could. This lead to my getting asked to perform with Stone Soup [iO’s first ever house team] in Chicago. We use to play in coffee houses and open mics.

PAM:  What year did you start your studies in Chicago at SC?

JONATHAN:  I took my first class at Second City in early December of 1979. I'm old.

PAM:  I'm old too. That makes two of us.

JONATHAN:  I was 20 when I was taking those first workshops.

PAM:  Who were some memorable teachers from those first years, the people who really inspired you to devote your life to improv?

JONATHAN:  Back then, during the five years that I consider to be my equal to a bachelor's in improvisation, I got to study with (alphabetically) Alan Baranowski, Danny Breen, Del Close, Don DePollo, Michael Gelman, Ed Greenburg, John Michelski, Sheldon Patinkin, Bryne Piven, Jeremy Pollack, Rob Riley, Paul Sills, and David Shepherd. Not a lot of women were teaching improv in Chicago then. There was Josephine Forsburg and Joyce Piven, but I didn't study with them. Charna [Halpern] had gotten started too, but during that time, I was learning David's 10 Improv Olympic Games from David in the early iO days.

PAM:  Oh boy! If you're able to alphabetize your teachers from 30 years ago, I can see how you would be the perfect person to head up the Chicago Festival Productions!

 JONATHAN:  Yes, but I can never remember the names of my current students at the Second City Training Co. It's one of those age things.

PAM: Ok. We'll skip ahead a decade or two. What lead to your founding of the Chicago Improv Festival with Frances Callier?

JONATHAN: I first learned about festivals by working as a production intern on the International Theatre Festival of Chicago in 1990. After that I worked as a production assistant for the Bolshoi Ballet's national tour of America. A few years passed and I got invited by a friend, David Schien, to become the Theater/Performance Art Curator for the Around the Coyote Arts Festival in Chicago. This lead to my producing and coordinating other theatre-based festivals. I was also working as a teacher and a director for a children's festival called Magic City, which was started by the late Maggie Daley and run by Cheryl Sloane (Joyce Sloane's daughter). Working for Cheryl was one Miss Frances Callier and we got along as co-workers and friends. One day, while working on the Bailiwick Repertory's Director Festival, it occurred to me, "Chicago's a city of festivals, how come there's never been an improv festival here?" So, the next day, I called Frances and asked to co-produce the Chicago Improv Festival with me. Turned out she had been wanting to produce an improv festival for years in Chicago and couldn't get anyone to do so with her. Thus, like peanut butter and chocolate, we joined forces to create and produce the first ever CIF, which took place over one week at the old Annoyance Theater in 1998.

PAM:  Was it hard to get troupes to perform? Or were people just chomping at the bit, waiting for the opportunity?

JONATHAN:  Both. On the one hand, there was a wait and see attitude from a lot of the local groups, but on the other hand every act or ensemble from outside of Chicago that we asked to come play said yes. Back then, it was invite only.

PAM:  Who were some of the stand out troupes from those first years?

JONATHAN:  Well, with the out of town groups we did have to hustle to get them to come to CIF. In the first year, we had some great sets by Annoyance, Brave New Workshop, Jeff Garlin, The Frayed Knots, Slotnick Katz & Lehr, and a special Thursday late night set featuring Scott Adsit, Mick Napier, and Dave Pasquesi.

PAM:  A great festival, even then!...CIF allows improvisers a rare and wonderful opportunity to observe the simultaneous creation of improv comedy, and obviously do some idea cross-pollination in the process. So thank you for that.

JONATHAN:  My love of international theatre goes back to my time with the International Theatre Festival of Chicago. It's always been important to me that every year CIF has had international improvisers. In year one, it was players from Toronto, Montreal and Amsterdam, and last year it was players from eight other countries. I feel it is so important for us as improv artists to see and share all the different ways there are to work and play. Culture affects communication and consciousness, and they in turn affect improvisational artistic impulses. I've noticed that while the culture of our countries are different, their training and saying yes and, is the same. Watching international improvisers play together is like watching an answer to the tower of Babel.

To play is universally human. How we play is the lens which reflects were we are from and what we have experienced.

PAM:  You get to hang out with – and often house! – a lot of international improvisers.

JONATHAN:   When its CIF time, I've always got international improvisers in my apartment, but after their first night (usually a night or two before the start of CIF), I am usually too busy working on CIF to spend a lot of time hanging out with them. Last year, the night before CIF began, there was a very cool and wonderful spontaneous musical improv jam in my front room as improvisers from France, Mexico, and Turkey were playing together on different musical instruments. I was the only American in my place and I was playing my didgeridoo with them.

PAM:  Thank you for being the first person to mention a didgeridoo in this series!

JONATHAN:  You're welcome and I hope I'm not the last. You can only improvise on a didgeridoo, as there's no set things to play on it. 

PAM:  That is particularly apt then.

JONATHAN:  One year at CIF, I got to play in a didgeridoo duo back stage at with Debra Wilson from MADtv. She was really good.

PAM:  Ok, now that's two didgeridoo stories. Nobody can live up to that, Jonathan. Nobody.

Jonathan in the CIF offices,
sans didgeridoo
JONATHAN:  Boom!

PAM:  You mentioned the similarities. Do you feel the international troupes work from the same basic "rules"?

JONATHAN:  Some of the groups do follow the same rules as in the USA. Some are more influenced by Keith Johnstone. Some are influenced by clowning and physical theatre. Some a big mixes of some or all of these things.

PAM:  Yet it's still fascinating that the artform can be created simultaneously in so many different countries, but the process and the end product is shockingly similar.

JONATHAN:  Yes, it all comes down to heartfelt moments and dick jokes.

PAM:  Hahah! That should be etched in the entryway to an improv theater, I think.

As the creator and producer of the College Improv Tournament and the Teen Comedy Festival, what changes are you seeing with young kids coming up in the improv world right now?

JONATHAN:  Well, just like they are processing the world differently because of being online creatures and social media addicts, their improvisation is different too. I just read an article by an author who said that the human species is now profoundly different because of how we process information. If that is true, then what is improvisation except a shared processing of information experienced simultaneously and responded from their own intuitive perspectives? Can you tell I was liberal arts major?

PAM:  Well, the didgeridoo thing threw me off into the musical history realm...but yeah. Who are the college improvisers' influences and what do you think motivates them to do improv?

 JONATHAN:  The college improvisers’ main influences are each other and themselves. Most are college clubs and they are able to hang out with people who become their best friends and college family. It's amazing to see how much these college kids learn from each other. And since very few of them have coaches, a lot of them end up creating their own version of improv. Much like Mick [Napier], Joe [Bill], and Mark [Sutton] and them did back at Indiana University when they created their own improv troupe without ever having seen improv -  a lot of these college kids are following a similar path. Not that they are trying to be the Annoyance; but instead be like the Annoyance, and do their own thing.

Other groups are studying very hard with teachers in their local big cities (Boston, New York, etc.,) and they are learning very quickly to take the best of what they learn and master it.

The average college group has been playing together for 2 to 4 years, and they practice once or twice a week and then perform too. Because they are not trying to be on 4 or 5 teams, like the average improviser does now in Chicago, they put all they have into their teams and it shows.

PAM:  Personally, I think, as a whole, our population is becoming faster-paced, less deep artistically and intellectually, and more interested in instant gratification. There is pressure from the audiences to provide that sort of entertainment, but also improvisers and theaters with that style are having great success. So the pressure to conform is coming from both ends. As an old fuddy-duddy, ‘Get-off-my-lawn-you-kids’ yeller, I’m concerned that the slow, theatrical-styled improv will be lost in the evolution. Are my fears founded, in your opinion? Or do I just need to grab a walker, a pair of adult diapers and start marketing my troupe as The Golden Girls?

JONATHAN:  As things move faster, there will always be people who will want to experience something slower and fuller. Maybe not in the same sized audience, but in the same passion.

Besides, while theaters like UCB have a strong hold on cities like New York and L.A., there are other cities like Austin, Minneapolis, San Francisco and Seattle that have their own scene, their own approach, and their own communities that have a wide range of playing styles. I sometimes think that each city has an improv scene that is a reflection of the city itself.

PAM:  That's pretty cool, isn't it? (Jeepers, it makes me just fall in love with improv all over again. And for some reason, I want to sing a Disney song.)

 JONATHAN:  Well, sing away Disney improv girl! 

PAM:  "It's a small world after all..." (I am SO SORRY to everyone who will read that and will be singing that infernal song for the rest of the week.)

You have a theory that there are the three types of improv (not the usual trio of longform, short form and “shlong” form). Can you tell me what they are please?

JONATHAN:  Yes, I have a theory that there are three kinds of approaches to improvisation, and it helps me to consider them in this fashion far better than the length of time of each improvisation. I know that Joe Bill has a three-tier take on improvisation too, and I've noticed some cross over in our conceptual terminology, so there might be something to both of us coming up with this around the same time.

PAM:  Oooh. I don't think I've heard Joe's three-tier approach theory yet. So I'm thrilled you are telling me yours. First!

JONATHAN:  For me, there's "Improv Comedy," "Improvisational Theater," and "Theatrical Improvisation". The aim of the first is to make an audience laugh, the second is to make an audience think, and the third is to make an audience feel.

PAM:  I love it.

JONATHAN:  To me, it doesn't matter the length of time, if there's costumes, or pre-defined characters, it’s all about the aim and pursuit of the piece that makes up its foundation. When I play with other improvisers in guest sets, I always try to find out what they are aiming for so that I can adjust myself to their approach. Kind of like if I played the violin, I'd play it differently in bluegrass, classical, jazz, rock or rap.

PAM: How do Improvisational Theater and Theatrical Improvisation differ?

JONATHAN: To me the difference between Improvisational Theater and Theatrical Improvisation is the elements that go into it, which of course affects what comes out of it. Some of the Theatrical Improvisation shows include The Doubtful Guests, Centralia, Burn Manhattan, Improsia, my show Storybox, and any show that uses Viewpoints as a major component. Viewpoints is the new dividing line in improvisation. You either love it or hate it, there's not much in-between. Also, some of the work that Jet Eveleth does would fit into this category too.

PAM:  Aside from improv, what do you really geek out on?

JONATHAN:  Chocolate.
On stage at the Kansas City Improv Festival

PAM:  Ha! Jonathan, you clearly are an innovator and someone who excels at turning ideas into realities. What propels you forward? What keeps gas in your tank, if you know what I mean?

JONATHAN:  Pam, thanks for calling me an innovator, I appreciate that. I love to create. Creating and connecting are my two blisses. There are so many ways to create, which is why I perform, teach, direct, and produce. In Canada and Europe, you can call yourself a creator of theatre and people know what that means. Here in the states, you have to use all the hyphens. I'm an actor/director/ etc. I'm a creator and I create improvisational experiences for myself and others to partake in, and I create them from both sides of the stage.

PAM:  I think I share your blisses. I like chocolate too.

JONATHAN:  Whoo-hoo! We're three for three!

PAM:  Yay! Last question: Are there any new ideas percolating in that fertile mind of yours that you’d like to put your energy into?

JONATHAN:  I have considered the possibility of moving away from Chicago to another city to be part of helping grow an improv center that utilizes the newer ideas and approaches of the work onstage and off. I don't know how many new ideas can come into Chicago as things here are pretty set and defined. As an improv artist, it’s up to me to pursue what draws me. I love doing Storybox, and I am proud to see the form grow with me and without me. I also want to visit more countries to interact with international improvisers. I've also had a friend who wants me to write an improv book. I also thought it might be cool to get a doctorate in improvisational studies (even if that sounds like a contradiction in terms).

PAM:  COME TO WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS!!!!!!!!!! We can bliss out on innovation and create the new center of the theatrical improv world!

JONATHAN:  That would be fun! I've thought about if I were to move, putting up a notice on Facebook like a free agent in sports to see who would want me. In my travels over the last two years, I've been asked a lot by my friends if I'd want to move to their city. I felt that was some of the best compliments I've ever gotten. I've said, if I move it would be for community, love, and work. Or at least two of the three. 

PAM:  We have lesbian, Democrats and nice people.

JONATHAN:  I am not going to define which of those three correlate to my three. 

PAM:  You don't have to…and I promise not to tell anyone you're a lesbian.

***
To enjoy one of the many fruits of Jonathan Pitts’ labor, you absolutely must check this year’s Chicago Improv Festival on April 23-29, 2012. In addition to terrific workshops given by some of the very best in the business, the show roster includes many highly lauded troupes and performers, such as BASSPROV (Chicago), Improvised Shakespeare Co. (Chicago), St. Clair and Morris (L.A.), Magnet Theatre Tour Co. (New York) and many, many more.
***



Pam Victor is the founding member of The Ha-Ha’s, and she producesThe Happier Valley Comedy Shows in Northampton, MA. Pam directs, produces and performs in the comic soap opera web series "Silent H, Deadly H". Pam also writes mostly humorous, mostly true essays and reviews of books, movies and tea on her blog,"My Nephew is a Poodle," where you also can read a lengthier, dorkier version of this interview.



Read More